Skip to main content


Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Health-related quality of life in adolescents with screening-detected celiac disease, before and one year after diagnosis and initiation of gluten-free diet, a prospective nested case-referent study

  • Katrina Nordyke1Email author,
  • Fredrik Norström1,
  • Lars Lindholm1,
  • Hans Stenlund1,
  • Anna Rosén1 and
  • Anneli Ivarsson1
BMC Public Health201313:142

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-142

Received: 1 October 2012

Accepted: 12 February 2013

Published: 16 February 2013

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting

Original Submission
1 Oct 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
28 Nov 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Mercedes Pico
2 Dec 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Tiberiu Hershcovici
28 Jan 2013 Author responded Author comments - Katrina Nordyke
Resubmission - Version 4
28 Jan 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 4
12 Feb 2013 Editorially accepted
16 Feb 2013 Article published 10.1186/1471-2458-13-142

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Epidemiology and Global Health, Umeå University