Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Women’s responses to changes in U.S. preventive task force’s mammography screening guidelines: results of focus groups with ethnically diverse women

  • Jennifer D Allen1, 2Email author,
  • Shirley Morrison Bluethmann3,
  • Margaret Sheets1,
  • Kelly Morrison Opdyke4,
  • Kathryn Gates-Ferris4,
  • Marc Hurlbert5 and
  • Elizabeth Harden1
BMC Public Health201313:1169

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-1169

Received: 24 July 2013

Accepted: 3 December 2013

Published: 12 December 2013

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
24 Jul 2013 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
31 Jul 2013 Author responded Author comments - Jennifer Allen
Resubmission - Version 3
31 Jul 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 3
12 Sep 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jo Waller
20 Sep 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Maggi Banning
26 Sep 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - AuTumn Davidson
26 Sep 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Marc Kiviniemi
14 Nov 2013 Author responded Author comments - Jennifer Allen
Resubmission - Version 4
14 Nov 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 4
14 Nov 2013 Author responded Author comments - Jennifer Allen
Resubmission - Version 5
14 Nov 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
3 Dec 2013 Editorially accepted
12 Dec 2013 Article published 10.1186/1471-2458-13-1169

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
(2)
Harvard Medical School
(3)
University of Texas School of Public Health
(4)
Cicatelli Associates Inc. (CAI)
(5)
Avon Foundation for Women

Advertisement