Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Development and validation of a measure of health literacy in the UK: the newest vital sign

  • Gill Rowlands1Email author,
  • Nina Khazaezadeh2,
  • Eugene Oteng-Ntim2,
  • Paul Seed3,
  • Suzanne Barr3 and
  • Barry D Weiss4
BMC Public Health201313:116

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-116

Received: 20 July 2012

Accepted: 3 January 2013

Published: 7 February 2013

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
20 Jul 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
28 Sep 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Joanne Protheroe
9 Oct 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Marie-Louise Essink-Bot
9 Dec 2012 Author responded Author comments - Gillian Rowlands
Resubmission - Version 4
9 Dec 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
3 Jan 2013 Editorially accepted
7 Feb 2013 Article published 10.1186/1471-2458-13-116

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
London South Bank University
(2)
Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust
(3)
Kings College London
(4)
University of Arizona

Advertisement