Biobanking across the phenome - at the center of chronic disease research
© Imboden and Probst-Hensch; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.Probst-Hensch 2013
Received: 27 July 2012
Accepted: 25 September 2013
Published: 25 November 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|27 Jul 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|28 Sep 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Naomi Allen|
|20 Feb 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - J. Jaime Miranda|
|15 Mar 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Dermot Maher|
|12 Jun 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Medea Imboden|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|12 Jun 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|14 Jun 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Dermot Maher|
|17 Jun 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Naomi Allen|
|5 Aug 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Medea Imboden|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|5 Aug 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|4 Sep 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Medea Imboden|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|4 Sep 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|25 Sep 2013||Editorially accepted|
|25 Nov 2013||Article published||10.1186/1471-2458-13-1094|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.