Skip to main content

Table 3 Un-adjusted odds ratio for HIV prevalence (Model 1); HIV testing (Model 2), and risk perception (Model 3) and by background characteristics

From: Socio-economic inequality and HIV in South Africa

 

Model 1: HIV prevalence

Model 2: HIV testing

Model 3: HIV risk perception

 

Un-adjusted odds ratio(OR)

Std. err

Un-adjusted odds ratio(OR)

Std. err

Un-adjusted odds ratio(OR)

Std. err

Sex: Female vs. Male

1.91***

0.19

1.95***

0.11

1.52***

0.10

Socio-economic Index (Upper SEIa)

      

Low (poor) SEI

5.48***

1.68

0.63***

0.05

5.46***

0.81

Middle SEI

3.97***

1.23

  

2.88***

0.40

Race: Blacks vs. Other Races

18.48***

3.10

0.72***

0.04

6.69***

0.70

Location (Urban Formala)

      

Urban Informal

2.74***

0.33

  

2.38***

0.28

Rural Informal

1.53***

0.19

0.65***

0.05

2.37***

0.22

Rural Formal

    

1.81***

0.27

Education (Secondarya)

      

No schooling

  

0.29***

0.04

1.75***

0.26

Less Secondary

1.36***

0.16

0.48***

0.03

1.46***

0.13

Tertiary

0.38***

0.09

1.79***

0.21

0.57***

0.08

Stigma Score: High vs. Low

0.80***

0.07

0.65***

0.04

0.88**

0.06

Information Access: High vs. Low

0.56***

0.05

1.60***

0.10

0.47***

0.04

N

9,742

 

11730

 

11748

 
  1. aReference group; ***significant at .1%; **significant at 1%.