Validation of an information–motivation–behavioral skills model of self-care among Chinese adults with type 2 diabetes
© Gao et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 12 July 2012
Accepted: 29 January 2013
Published: 4 February 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|12 Jul 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|26 Sep 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Dong Zhao|
|8 Nov 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Lindsay Mayberry|
|10 Nov 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ken Wallston|
|4 Jan 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Junling Gao|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|4 Jan 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|8 Jan 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Lindsay Mayberry|
|17 Jan 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Dong Zhao|
|19 Jan 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ken Wallston|
|23 Jan 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Junling Gao|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|23 Jan 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|29 Jan 2013||Editorially accepted|
|4 Feb 2013||Article published||10.1186/1471-2458-13-100|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.