Table 3 Incidence and intensity of CHE across the income groups
From: Out-of-pocket healthcare payments on chronic conditions impoverish urban poor in Bangalore, India
Income groups | Measures of CHE | Catastrophic threshold (share of household income) used to measure CHE | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
5% | 10% | 15% | 20% | ||
First quintile (Poorest) | Headcount (%) (95%CI) | 38.1 (34.2, 41.9) | 23.1 (19.7, 26.4) | 14.2 (11.4, 16.9) | 11.0 (8.5, 13.4) |
| Â | Overshoot (%) (95%CI) | 6.7 (4.5, 8.9) | 5.3 (3.2, 7.4) | 4.4 (2.4, 6.5) | 3.8 (1.8, 5.8) |
| Â | Mean Positive Overshoot (%) | 17.6 | 22.9 | 31.0 | 34.5 |
Second quintile | Headcount (%) (95%CI) | 27.4 (23.9, 30.9) | 13.8 (11.1, 16.6) | 6.6 (4.6, 8.6) | 4.7 (3.0, 6.3) |
| Â | Overshoot (%) (95%CI) | 2.3 (1.8, 2.9) | 1.4 (0.9, 1.8) | 0.9 (0.5, 1.3) | 0.6 (0.3, 1.0) |
| Â | Mean Positive Overshoot (%) | 8.4 | 10.1 | 13.6 | 12.8 |
Third quintile | Headcount (%) (95%CI) | 20.7 (17.5, 23.8) | 10.2 (7.8, 12.5) | 6.0 (4.2, 7.9) | 4.1 (2.6, 5.7) |
| Â | Overshoot (%) (95%CI) | 2.1 (1.4, 2.7) | 1.4 (0.8, 1.9) | 1.0 (0.5, 1.5) | 0.7 (0.3, 1.2) |
| Â | Mean Positive Overshoot (%) | 10.1 | 13.7 | 16.7 | 17.1 |
Fourth quintile | Headcount (%) (95%CI) | 23.7 (20.0, 27.4) | 11.6 (8.8, 14.4) | 7.6 (5.3, 10.0) | 4.9 (3.0, 6.8) |
|  | Overshoot (%) (95%CI) | 5.6 (−5.7, 11.7) | 4.7 (−1.4, 10.8) | 4.3 (−1.8, 10.3) | 4.0 (−2.1, 10.0) |
| Â | Mean Positive Overshoot (%) | 23.6 | 40.5 | 56.6 | 81.6 |
Fifth quintile (Least poor) | Headcount (%) (95%CI) | 16.9 (14.2, 19.7) | 8.2 (6.2, 10.2) | 2.2 (1.1, 3.3) | 0.3 (−0.1, 0.7) |
|  | Overshoot (%) (95%CI) | 1.1 (0.6, 1.5) | 0.5 (0.1, 0.9) | 0.3 (−0.1, 0.7) | 0.2 (−0.2, 0.6) |
| Â | Mean Positive Overshoot (%) | 6.5 | 6.1 | 13.6 | 66.7 |
Overall | Headcount (%) (95%CI) | 27.5 (26.0, 29.1) | 16.0 (14.8, 17.3) | 10.1 (9.1, 11.2) | 7.9 (6.9, 8.8) |
| Â | Overshoot (%) (95%CI) | 3.4 (2.3, 4.5) | 2.5 (1.4, 3.6) | 2.0 (0.9, 3.1) | 1.7 (0.7, 2.8) |
| Â | Mean Positive Overshoot (%) | 12.4 | 15.6 | 19.8 | 21.5 |