Prevalence of HIV among MSM in Europe: comparison of self-reported diagnoses from a large scale internet survey and existing national estimates
© Marcus et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 20 June 2012
Accepted: 19 October 2012
Published: 14 November 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|20 Jun 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|27 Jun 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Ulrich Marcus|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|27 Jun 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|12 Sep 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Martin Donoghoe|
|25 Sep 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Chris Beyrer|
|15 Oct 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Ulrich Marcus|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|15 Oct 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|19 Oct 2012||Editorially accepted|
|14 Nov 2012||Article published||10.1186/1471-2458-12-978|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.