The structure of psychological life satisfaction: insights from farmers and a general community sample in Australia
© OBrien et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 30 October 2011
Accepted: 16 October 2012
Published: 14 November 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|30 Oct 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|8 Nov 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Lean OBrien|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|8 Nov 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|22 Mar 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Robert Cummins|
|15 Jun 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Gareth Davey|
|19 Jun 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Brent Donnellan|
|19 Aug 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Lean OBrien|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|19 Aug 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|30 Aug 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Brent Donnellan|
|2 Sep 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Gareth Davey|
|5 Oct 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Lean OBrien|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|5 Oct 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|16 Oct 2012||Editorially accepted|
|14 Nov 2012||Article published||10.1186/1471-2458-12-976|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.