Skip to main content

Table 2 Sampling strategy and sample size calculations for each Integra research component

From: Study protocol for the Integra Initiative to assess the benefits and costs of integrating sexual and reproductive health and HIV services in Kenya and Swaziland

Research Component

Sampling strategy

Key indicators used in sample size calculation

Adjustments to sample calculation

Model 1. Kenya FP

Model 2. Kenya PNC

Model 2. Swaziland PNC

Sampling of facilities

Theoretical sampling to point of saturation within province

4 criteria: high client load; minimum of 2 FP providers; range of SRH services available; no current provision of SRH-HIV integration

n/a

12 facilities: 6 Intervention and 6 Comparison

12 facilities: 6 Intervention and 6 Comparison

8 facilities: 4 Intervention and 4 Comparison*

HFAs: Facility inventory

   

1 per facility

1 per facility

1 per facility

HFAs: Client exit interviews & linked observations of consultations

Consecutive sample and saturation

Quality of Care analysis 6 CPIs

No

18 per facility: 6 new clients, 6 repeat clients and 6 clients switching FP method

6 within 48 hours postpartum 6 at one week and 6 at 6 weeks per facility

6 within 48 hours postpartum 6 at one week and 6 at 6 weeks

HFAs: Structured interviews with providers

Convenience

All providers working in MCH-FP units

No

3-6 providers per facility

3-6 providers per facility

3-6 providers per facility

HFAs: Client flow assessment

Census over 5 days based on existing client load

 

No

50 – 200 clients per day

50 – 200 clients per day

50 – 200 clients per day

Cohort

Consecutive sample of female clients (recruited if within 12 weeks post-partum in PNC facilities)

Kenya: 80% power to detect a 5% increase in condom use, among all women in PNC and those using other contraceptive methods in FP facilities.

1952 clients: 976 from Intervention and 976 from Comparison facilities

   
 

Swaziland: To detect a 7% increase in condom use among PNC clients.

30% loss to follow up; over-sampling of HIV-positive clients until min of 400 in Intervention & Comparison facilities

1978 clients: 989 from Intervention and 989 from Comparison facilities

   

Household survey

3-stage cluster survey design, for random selection of EAs, households and individuals

80% power to detect 10% increase in % of women who have ever used study facility.

Design effect of 2.0

1632 (816 male; 816 female) within 10km catchment area of FP facilities

n/a

816 (408 male; 408 female) within 10km catchment area of PNC facilities

Qualitative – in-depth interviews

    

Providers

Convenience sampling

  

1-3 providers per facility

1-3 providers per facility

1-3 providers per facility

Cohort clients

Purposive sampling to reflect issues emerging from quantitative data

 

25 HIV-positive clients; and 25 other clients

25 HIV-positive clients; and 25 other clients

25 HIV-positive clients; and 25 other clients

 

Community members

Purposive sampling to reflect issues emerging from quantitative data

 

20 men

n/a

20 men

 
  1. * 2 facilities subsequently added due to lower than expected client load at comparison sites.