Research Component | Sampling strategy | Key indicators used in sample size calculation | Adjustments to sample calculation | Model 1. Kenya FP | Model 2. Kenya PNC | Model 2. Swaziland PNC |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sampling of facilities | Theoretical sampling to point of saturation within province | 4 criteria: high client load; minimum of 2 FP providers; range of SRH services available; no current provision of SRH-HIV integration | n/a | 12 facilities: 6 Intervention and 6 Comparison | 12 facilities: 6 Intervention and 6 Comparison | 8 facilities: 4 Intervention and 4 Comparison* |
HFAs: Facility inventory | Â | Â | Â | 1 per facility | 1 per facility | 1 per facility |
HFAs: Client exit interviews & linked observations of consultations | Consecutive sample and saturation | Quality of Care analysis 6 CPIs | No | 18 per facility: 6 new clients, 6 repeat clients and 6 clients switching FP method | 6 within 48 hours postpartum 6 at one week and 6 at 6 weeks per facility | 6 within 48 hours postpartum 6 at one week and 6 at 6 weeks |
HFAs: Structured interviews with providers | Convenience | All providers working in MCH-FP units | No | 3-6 providers per facility | 3-6 providers per facility | 3-6 providers per facility |
HFAs: Client flow assessment | Census over 5 days based on existing client load |  | No | 50 – 200 clients per day | 50 – 200 clients per day | 50 – 200 clients per day |
Cohort | Consecutive sample of female clients (recruited if within 12 weeks post-partum in PNC facilities) | Kenya: 80% power to detect a 5% increase in condom use, among all women in PNC and those using other contraceptive methods in FP facilities. | 1952 clients: 976 from Intervention and 976 from Comparison facilities | Â | Â | Â |
 | Swaziland: To detect a 7% increase in condom use among PNC clients. | 30% loss to follow up; over-sampling of HIV-positive clients until min of 400 in Intervention & Comparison facilities | 1978 clients: 989 from Intervention and 989 from Comparison facilities |  |  |  |
Household survey | 3-stage cluster survey design, for random selection of EAs, households and individuals | 80% power to detect 10% increase in % of women who have ever used study facility. | Design effect of 2.0 | 1632 (816 male; 816 female) within 10km catchment area of FP facilities | n/a | 816 (408 male; 408 female) within 10km catchment area of PNC facilities |
Qualitative – in-depth interviews |  |  |  |  | ||
Providers | Convenience sampling | Â | Â | 1-3 providers per facility | 1-3 providers per facility | 1-3 providers per facility |
Cohort clients | Purposive sampling to reflect issues emerging from quantitative data | Â | 25 HIV-positive clients; and 25 other clients | 25 HIV-positive clients; and 25 other clients | 25 HIV-positive clients; and 25 other clients | Â |
Community members | Purposive sampling to reflect issues emerging from quantitative data | Â | 20 men | n/a | 20 men | Â |