Determinants of intention to get tested for STI/HIV among the Surinamese and Antilleans in the Netherlands: results of an online survey
© Westmaas et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 27 March 2012
Accepted: 31 October 2012
Published: 9 November 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|27 Mar 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|10 Apr 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Alvin Westmaas|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|10 Apr 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|15 May 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jochen Mikolajczak|
|22 Jun 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Adrian Mindel|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|15 Sep 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Alvin Westmaas|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|15 Sep 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|28 Sep 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Adrian Mindel|
|8 Oct 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jochen Mikolajczak|
|Resubmission - Version 6|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 6|
|31 Oct 2012||Editorially accepted|
|9 Nov 2012||Article published||10.1186/1471-2458-12-961|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.