Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Attrition and generalizability in longitudinal studies: findings from a 15-year population-based study and a Monte Carlo simulation study

  • Kristin Gustavson1Email author,
  • Tilmann von Soest1, 2,
  • Evalill Karevold1 and
  • Espen Røysamb1, 2
BMC Public Health201212:918

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-918

Received: 4 April 2012

Accepted: 17 October 2012

Published: 29 October 2012

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
4 Apr 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
14 Jun 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Lau Thygesen
24 Jul 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Lin Guey
12 Sep 2012 Author responded Author comments - Kristin Gustavson
Resubmission - Version 3
12 Sep 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
19 Sep 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Lau Thygesen
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
17 Oct 2012 Editorially accepted
29 Oct 2012 Article published 10.1186/1471-2458-12-918

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Division of Mental Health, Department of Child and Adolescent Mental Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health
(2)
Department of Psychology, University of Oslo

Advertisement