Skip to main content


Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Ability of a biomarker-based score to predict death from circulatory disease and cancer in NHANES III

  • Mieke Van Hemelrijck1Email author,
  • Monika Eichholzer2,
  • David Faeh2 and
  • Sabine Rohrmann2
BMC Public Health201212:895

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-895

Received: 1 June 2012

Accepted: 3 October 2012

Published: 23 October 2012

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting

Original Submission
1 Jun 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
6 Jul 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Duk-Hee Lee
23 Jul 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - William Dow
13 Aug 2012 Author responded Author comments - Mieke Van Hemelrijck
Resubmission - Version 3
13 Aug 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
24 Aug 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Duk-Hee Lee
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
3 Oct 2012 Editorially accepted
23 Oct 2012 Article published 10.1186/1471-2458-12-895

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

King’s College London, School of Medicine, Division of Cancer Studies, Cancer Epidemiology Group, Research Oncology
Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Zurich