Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
18 Mar 2012 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
8 May 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Awat Feizi |
1 Jun 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jeroen Lakerveld |
2 Jul 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Rachel Laws |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
2 Jul 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
13 Jul 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jeroen Lakerveld |
21 Jul 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Awat Feizi |
11 Aug 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Rachel Laws |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
11 Aug 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
11 Aug 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Rachel Laws |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
11 Aug 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
23 Aug 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jeroen Lakerveld |
10 Sep 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Rachel Laws |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
10 Sep 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
Publishing | ||
10 Sep 2012 | Editorially accepted | |
24 Sep 2012 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2458-12-822 |
You can find further information about peer review here.