Relationship between the physical environment and different domains of physical activity in European adults: a systematic review
© Van Holle et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 7 May 2012
Accepted: 13 September 2012
Published: 19 September 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|7 May 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|12 Jul 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Elisa Marques|
|13 Jul 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Andreia Nogueira Pizarro|
|16 Jul 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Maria Paula Santos|
|18 Jul 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Klaus Gebel|
|22 Jul 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Rute Santos|
|23 Jul 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Gabrielle Pucci|
|1 Sep 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Veerle Van Holle|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|1 Sep 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|7 Sep 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Elisa Marques|
|7 Sep 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Andreia Nogueira Pizarro|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|13 Sep 2012||Editorially accepted|
|19 Sep 2012||Article published||10.1186/1471-2458-12-807|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.