Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Exploring laypeople’s epistemic beliefs about medicine – a factor-analytic survey study

BMC Public Health201212:759

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-759

Received: 9 September 2011

Accepted: 3 September 2012

Published: 10 September 2012

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
9 Sep 2011 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
18 Mar 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Rohit Ramaswamy
21 Mar 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - ann roex
21 Mar 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sivia Barnoy
20 Jun 2012 Author responded Author comments - Dorothe Kienhues
Resubmission - Version 3
20 Jun 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
8 Jul 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Rohit Ramaswamy
10 Jul 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sivia Barnoy
18 Jul 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - ann roex
7 Aug 2012 Author responded Author comments - Dorothe Kienhues
Resubmission - Version 4
7 Aug 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
3 Sep 2012 Editorially accepted
10 Sep 2012 Article published 10.1186/1471-2458-12-759

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Psychology, University of Muenster

Advertisement