Exploring laypeople’s epistemic beliefs about medicine – a factor-analytic survey study
© Kienhues and Bromme; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 9 September 2011
Accepted: 3 September 2012
Published: 10 September 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|9 Sep 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|18 Mar 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Rohit Ramaswamy|
|21 Mar 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - ann roex|
|21 Mar 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Sivia Barnoy|
|20 Jun 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Dorothe Kienhues|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|20 Jun 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|8 Jul 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Rohit Ramaswamy|
|10 Jul 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Sivia Barnoy|
|18 Jul 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - ann roex|
|7 Aug 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Dorothe Kienhues|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|7 Aug 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|3 Sep 2012||Editorially accepted|
|10 Sep 2012||Article published||10.1186/1471-2458-12-759|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.