Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

The potential impact of plain packaging of cigarette products among Brazilian young women: an experimental study

  • Christine M White1,
  • David Hammond1Email author,
  • James F Thrasher2, 3 and
  • Geoffrey T Fong4, 5
BMC Public Health201212:737

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-737

Received: 19 December 2011

Accepted: 13 August 2012

Published: 4 September 2012

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
19 Dec 2011 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
20 Dec 2011 Author responded Author comments - David Hammond
Resubmission - Version 3
20 Dec 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 3
1 Feb 2012 Author responded Author comments - David Hammond
Resubmission - Version 4
1 Feb 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 4
19 Mar 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Olivia Maynard
1 Apr 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Janet Hoek
7 May 2012 Author responded Author comments - David Hammond
Resubmission - Version 5
7 May 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 5
8 May 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Janet Hoek
12 May 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Olivia Maynard
Resubmission - Version 6
Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
13 Aug 2012 Editorially accepted
4 Sep 2012 Article published 10.1186/1471-2458-12-737

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
School of Public Health & Health Systems, University of Waterloo
(2)
Department of Health Promotion, Education and Behavior, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina
(3)
Departamento de Investigaciones sobre Tabaco, Centro de Investigación en Salud Poblacional, Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública
(4)
Department of Psychology, University of Waterloo
(5)
Ontario Institute for Cancer Research

Advertisement