The potential impact of plain packaging of cigarette products among Brazilian young women: an experimental study
© White et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 19 December 2011
Accepted: 13 August 2012
Published: 4 September 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|19 Dec 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|20 Dec 2011||Author responded||Author comments - David Hammond|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|20 Dec 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|1 Feb 2012||Author responded||Author comments - David Hammond|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|1 Feb 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|19 Mar 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Olivia Maynard|
|1 Apr 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Janet Hoek|
|7 May 2012||Author responded||Author comments - David Hammond|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|7 May 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|8 May 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Janet Hoek|
|12 May 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Olivia Maynard|
|Resubmission - Version 6|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 6|
|13 Aug 2012||Editorially accepted|
|4 Sep 2012||Article published||10.1186/1471-2458-12-737|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.