Unmet need for induction of labor in Africa: secondary analysis from the 2004 - 2005 WHO Global Maternal and Perinatal Health Survey (A cross-sectional survey)
© Fawole et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 11 May 2012
Accepted: 27 August 2012
Published: 31 August 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|11 May 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|11 Jun 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - maureen chileshe chisembele|
|18 Jul 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - paul alozie Feyi-Waboso|
|30 Jul 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Bukola Fawole|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|30 Jul 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|22 Aug 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - paul alozie Feyi-Waboso|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|27 Aug 2012||Editorially accepted|
|31 Aug 2012||Article published||10.1186/1471-2458-12-722|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.