External validity in healthy public policy: application of the RE-AIM tool to the field of housing improvement
© Thomson and Thomas; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 21 December 2011
Accepted: 2 August 2012
Published: 9 August 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|21 Dec 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|16 Jan 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Hilary Thomson|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|16 Jan 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|10 Apr 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Alvin Mares|
|23 Apr 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Philippa Howden-Chapman|
|22 May 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Hilary Thomson|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|22 May 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|2 Jun 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Alvin Mares|
|5 Jul 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Hilary Thomson|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|5 Jul 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|5 Jul 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Alvin Mares|
|Resubmission - Version 6|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 6|
|2 Aug 2012||Editorially accepted|
|9 Aug 2012||Article published||10.1186/1471-2458-12-633|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.