Life course socio-economic position and quality of life in adulthood: a systematic review of life course models
© Niedzwiedz et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 17 April 2012
Accepted: 3 August 2012
Published: 9 August 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|17 Apr 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|15 May 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - David Blane|
|23 May 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Danielle Groffen|
|23 May 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Gareth Hagger-Johnson|
|13 Jun 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Claire Niedzwiedz|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|13 Jun 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|20 Jun 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - David Blane|
|25 Jun 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Danielle Groffen|
|26 Jun 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Gareth Hagger-Johnson|
|12 Jul 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Claire Niedzwiedz|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|12 Jul 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|3 Aug 2012||Editorially accepted|
|9 Aug 2012||Article published||10.1186/1471-2458-12-628|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.