Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Public perception of drinking water safety in South Africa 2002–2009: a repeated cross-sectional study

  • Jim A Wright1Email author,
  • Hong Yang1,
  • Ulrike Rivett2 and
  • Stephen W Gundry3
BMC Public Health201212:556

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-556

Received: 20 March 2012

Accepted: 13 July 2012

Published: 27 July 2012

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
20 Mar 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
10 Apr 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Laura Pomeroy
19 Apr 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Claire Furlong
6 Jun 2012 Author responded Author comments - Jim Wright
Resubmission - Version 3
6 Jun 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
21 Jun 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Claire Furlong
25 Jun 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Laura Pomeroy
11 Jul 2012 Author responded Author comments - Jim Wright
Resubmission - Version 4
11 Jul 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
13 Jul 2012 Editorially accepted
27 Jul 2012 Article published 10.1186/1471-2458-12-556

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Geography and Environment, University of Southampton
(2)
iCOMMS, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Cape Town
(3)
Water and Health Research Centre, Merchant Venturers Building, University of Bristol

Advertisement