Skip to main content


Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Recruitment into diabetes prevention programs: what is the impact of errors in self-reported measures of obesity?

  • Andrea Hernan1Email author,
  • Benjamin Philpot1,
  • Edward D Janus1, 2 and
  • James A Dunbar1
BMC Public Health201212:510

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-510

Received: 28 November 2011

Accepted: 25 June 2012

Published: 8 July 2012

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting

Original Submission
28 Nov 2011 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
10 Jan 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jaana Lindström
16 Apr 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Lynette L-Y Lim
7 May 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Anne Karen Jenum
8 Jun 2012 Author responded Author comments - Andrea Hernan
Resubmission - Version 3
8 Jun 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
25 Jun 2012 Editorially accepted
8 Jul 2012 Article published 10.1186/1471-2458-12-510

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

Greater Green Triangle University Department of Rural Health, Flinders University and Deakin University
Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Western Hospital