Skip to main content


Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Variations in risk and protective factors for life satisfaction and mental wellbeing with deprivation: a cross-sectional study

  • Mark A Bellis1Email author,
  • Helen Lowey2,
  • Karen Hughes1,
  • Lynn Deacon1,
  • Jude Stansfield3 and
  • Clare Perkins1
BMC Public Health201212:492

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-492

Received: 16 March 2012

Accepted: 2 July 2012

Published: 2 July 2012

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting

Original Submission
16 Mar 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
2 May 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Heli Koivumaa-Honkanen
4 May 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Miranda Thurston
25 May 2012 Author responded Author comments - Mark Bellis
Resubmission - Version 3
25 May 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
2 Jul 2012 Editorially accepted
2 Jul 2012 Article published 10.1186/1471-2458-12-492

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

Centre for Public Health, Liverpool John Moores University
Blackburn with Darwen Care Trust Plus, Guide Business Centre
Independent Public Health Specialist