Skip to main content

Table 2 Quantity and Quality of Social Contact (those who met someone with/without mental health problems [MHP])

From: Mass social contact interventions and their effect on mental health related stigma and intended discrimination

 

People with MHP a (n = 102) n (%)

People w/o MHP (n = 65) n (%)

Fisher’s Exact Test (p-value)

1. How did you know the person you met did/did not have a mental health problem

 They told me

38 (42.2)

26 (44.8)

0.42

 Someone else told me

2 (2.2)

5 (8.6)

0.08

 I made an assumption

29 (32.2)

13 (22.4)

0.15

 Other

21 (23.3)

14 (24.1)

0.52

b2. Presence of facilitating conditionsc (agree strongly)

 Equal Status

35 (36.5)

15 (31.3)

0.08

 Common Goals

43 (42.2)

26 (40.0)

0.46

 Intergroup cooperation

45 (44.1)

28 (43.1)

0.52

 Friendship potential

23 (22.6)

8 (12.3)

0.07

3. How long did you speak with the individual you met? (asked at follow-up)

 Less than 1 minute

6 (15.8)

0 (0.0)

0.17

 1–5 minutes

18 (47.4)

5 (41.7)

0.32

 5–10 minutes

5 (13.2)

3 (25.0)

0.50

 10+ minutes

9 (23.7)

4 (33.3)

0.38

4. How well do you remember your conversation? (asked at follow-up)

 Very well

10 (26.3)

8 (66.7)

*0.01

 A little bit

18 (47.4)

4 (33.3)

0.30

 Do not remember

10 (26.3)

0 (0.0)

*0.05

5. Actions since event (asked at follow-up)

 Talked with others about event

5 (8.2)

2 (9.1)

0.68

 Visited website

29 (47.5)

10 (45.5)

0.16

 Joined Pledge

10 (16.4)

4 (18.2)

0.54

 Facebook/twitter

11 (18.0)

2 (9.1)

0.30

 None

11 (28.9)

2 (20.0)

0.33

  1. a 102 people with mental health problems and 65 without mental health problems answered questions 1 and 2. The sample size was lower for questions 3–5 (n = 61 for people with mental health problems and n = 22 for people without mental health problems)
  2. b can tick more than one
  3. a facilitating social contact conditions refer tothe specific conditions theorised by Allport and Pettigrew as being associated with optimal social contact.
  4. * p <0.05