Cardiovascular diseases and Type 2 Diabetes in Bangladesh: A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies between 1995 and 2010
- Nazmus Saquib†1,
- Juliann Saquib†1,
- Tahmeed Ahmed2,
- Masuma Akter Khanam2 and
- Mark R Cullen1Email author
© Saquib et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 15 December 2011
Accepted: 28 May 2012
Published: 13 June 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|15 Dec 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|12 Jan 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Itamar Santos|
|21 Jan 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Isabela Bensenor|
|9 Apr 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Mark Cullen|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|9 Apr 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|16 Apr 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Isabela Bensenor|
|28 Apr 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Itamar Santos|
|11 May 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Mark Cullen|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|11 May 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|21 May 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Isabela Bensenor|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|28 May 2012||Editorially accepted|
|13 Jun 2012||Article published||10.1186/1471-2458-12-434|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.