Lessons drawn from research utilization in the maternal iodine supplementation policy development in Thailand
© Tonmukayakul et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 30 November 2011
Accepted: 30 May 2012
Published: 30 May 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|30 Nov 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|10 Feb 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Karen Daniels|
|14 Feb 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ruth Musila|
|21 Mar 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Roman Perez Velasco|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|21 Mar 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|9 Apr 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Karen Daniels|
|12 Apr 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ruth Musila|
|1 May 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Roman Perez Velasco|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|1 May 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|13 May 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ruth Musila|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|30 May 2012||Editorially accepted|
|30 May 2012||Article published||10.1186/1471-2458-12-391|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.