“Health divide” between indigenous and non-indigenous populations in Kerala, India: Population based study
© Haddad et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 8 September 2011
Accepted: 19 March 2012
Published: 29 May 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|8 Sep 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|13 Oct 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Premananda Bharati|
|19 Oct 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Srinivasan Kannan|
|4 Nov 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ellen Van de Poel|
|14 Jan 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Slim Haddad|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|14 Jan 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|20 Jan 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Srinivasan Kannan|
|1 Feb 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Premananda Bharati|
|10 Feb 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ellen Van de Poel|
|9 Mar 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Slim Haddad|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|9 Mar 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|19 Mar 2012||Editorially accepted|
|29 May 2012||Article published||10.1186/1471-2458-12-390|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.