A qualitative study of leadership characteristics among women who catalyze positive community change
© Folta et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 16 December 2011
Accepted: 28 May 2012
Published: 28 May 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|16 Dec 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|11 Jan 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Robert Goodman|
|27 Jan 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Andy Garman|
|27 Jan 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Tom Delbanco|
|31 Jan 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - David Taylor-Robinson|
|1 Feb 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Natalie DeWitt|
|31 Mar 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Sara Folta|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|31 Mar 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|13 Apr 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - David Taylor-Robinson|
|15 Apr 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Robert Goodman|
|7 May 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Andy Garman|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|28 May 2012||Editorially accepted|
|28 May 2012||Article published||10.1186/1471-2458-12-383|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.