Predictors of condom use and refusal among the population of Free State province in South Africa
© Chandran et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 9 February 2011
Accepted: 28 May 2012
Published: 28 May 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|9 Feb 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|8 May 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Carmen Alvarez|
|20 Jun 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Kofi Benefo|
|18 Oct 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Niko Speybroeck|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|18 Oct 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|7 Nov 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Carmen Alvarez|
|20 Nov 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Kofi Benefo|
|3 Jan 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Niko Speybroeck|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|3 Jan 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|21 Feb 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Kofi Benefo|
|1 Apr 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Niko Speybroeck|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|1 Apr 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|28 May 2012||Editorially accepted|
|28 May 2012||Article published||10.1186/1471-2458-12-381|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.