Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Adopting and implementing nutrition guidelines in recreational facilities: Public and private sector roles. A multiple case study

BMC Public Health201212:376

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-376

Received: 6 March 2012

Accepted: 2 May 2012

Published: 25 May 2012

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
6 Mar 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
2 Apr 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sandra Abreu
5 Apr 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Patti-Jean Naylor
16 Apr 2012 Author responded Author comments - Linda McCargar
Resubmission - Version 3
16 Apr 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
23 Apr 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sandra Abreu
26 Apr 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Patti-Jean Naylor
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
2 May 2012 Editorially accepted
25 May 2012 Article published 10.1186/1471-2458-12-376

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Alberta Institute for Human Nutrition, University of Alberta
(2)
Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta
(3)
Centre for Health Promotion Studies, University of Alberta

Advertisement