Skip to main content

Table 3 Standardized  T  -scores of the program evaluation items in the stage groups

From: Are the stages of change relevant for the development and implementation of a web-based tailored alcohol intervention? A cross-sectional study

 

PC; n = 51

CP; n = 29

AM; n = 66

LSD contrasts

Questions

The questions were clearly stated.

50.71

48.80

49.98

PC, CP, AM

The questions were posed in logical order.

49.39

47.77

51.45

PC, CP, AM

The questions were easy to answer.

51.29

46.96

50.34

PC, CP, AM

The questionnaire was too long. 1

47.96

51.60

50.88

PC, CP, AM

The instructions for filling out the questionnaire were clear.

49.19

49.51

50.84

PC, CP, AM

Advice

The advice was relevant for me.

48.41

52.25

50.24

PC, CP, AM

The advice was believable.

48.24

50.02

51.35

PC, CP, AM

The advice was clearly arranged.

49.19

47.84

51.58

PC, CP, AM

The advice was informative.

47.97

49.35

51.85

PC < AM; PC, CP; CP, AM

The advice was clear.

48.91

48.50

51.50

PC, CP, AM

The advice was complete.

50.66

47.29

50.68

PC, CP, AM

The advice helps me to improve my drinking behavior.

47.06

56.57

49.39

PC < CP > AM; PC, AM

The advice stimulates me to improve my drinking behavior.

45.79

58.00

49.74

PC < CP > AM; PC < AM

I miss information in the advice. 1

49.99

48.00

50.89

PC, CP, AM

The advice was consistent with my answers.

50.11

52.50

48.82

PC, CP, AM

The information was interesting.

49.39

51.01

50.03

PC, CP, AM

The information was new to me.

49.17

51.42

50.02

PC, CP, AM

The pieces of advice were too long. 1

50.62

51.19

49.00

PC, CP, AM

The advice was confusing. 1

50.62

50.46

49.32

PC, CP, AM

Too much information was given. 1

49.29

50.44

50.36

PC, CP, AM

I agree with the advice I received.

47.02

52.58

51.17

PC < CP, AM

I can learn better from video-based messages than text-based messages. 1

48.56

50.84

50.75

PC, CP, AM

Grade for the advice

47.61

51.96

50.98

PC, CP, AM

Layout

The advice was nice in terms of layout and readability.

48.59

49.79

51.18

PC, CP, AM

I like the layout of the website.

49.24

50.23

50.49

PC, CP, AM

Functionality

I had problems opening the website. 1

50.79

46.51

50.93

PC, CP, AM

I had problems with colors, letter types and/or pictures used in the program. 1

49.82

47.43

51.27

PC, CP, AM

I had problems printing the advice. 1

51.58

47.67

49.80

PC, CP, AM

The program is user-friendly.

48.51

52.15

50.21

PC, CP, AM

The program is a good choice for giving personal feedback.

50.24

49.89

49.86

PC, CP, AM

Grade for the program

48.02

50.35

51.37

PC, CP, AM

  1. Note. PC = precontemplation; CP = contemplation/preparation; AM = action/maintenance.
  2. CP < AM: the mean score of CP is significantly lower than that of AM.
  3. PC, CP, AM: the mean scores of PC, CP and AM are equal.
  4. 1 These items are coded the other way around.