Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
9 Sep 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
4 Oct 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Marian Currie |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
4 Oct 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
28 Oct 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Rachel Sacks-Davis |
30 Oct 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Kevin Theunissen |
23 Dec 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Marian Currie |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
23 Dec 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
10 Jan 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Rachel Sacks-Davis |
22 Jan 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Kevin Theunissen |
29 Feb 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Marian Currie |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
29 Feb 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
Publishing | ||
9 May 2012 | Editorially accepted | |
9 May 2012 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2458-12-341 |
You can find further information about peer review here.