A school-based comprehensive lifestyle intervention among chinese kids against obesity (CLICK-Obesity): rationale, design and methodology of a randomized controlled trial in Nanjing city, China
© Xu et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 13 December 2011
Accepted: 30 April 2012
Published: 15 June 2012
The prevalence of childhood obesity among adolescents has been rapidly rising in Mainland China in recent decades, especially in urban and rich areas. There is an urgent need to develop effective interventions to prevent childhood obesity. Limited data regarding adolescent overweight prevention in China are available. Thus, we developed a school-based intervention with the aim of reducing excess body weight in children. This report described the study design.
We designed a cluster randomized controlled trial in 8 randomly selected urban primary schools between May 2010 and December 2013. Each school was randomly assigned to either the intervention or control group (four schools in each group). Participants were the 4th graders in each participating school. The multi-component program was implemented within the intervention group, while students in the control group followed their usual health and physical education curriculum with no additional intervention program. The intervention consisted of four components: a) classroom curriculum, (including physical education and healthy diet education), b) school environment support, c) family involvement, and d) fun programs/events. The primary study outcome was body composition, and secondary outcomes were behaviour and behavioural determinants.
The intervention was designed with due consideration of Chinese cultural and familial tradition, social convention, and current primary education and exam system in Mainland China. We did our best to gain good support from educational authorities, school administrators, teachers and parents, and to integrate intervention components into schools’ regular academic programs. The results of and lesson learned from this study will help guide future school-based childhood obesity prevention programs in Mainland China.
Registration number: ChiCTR-ERC-11001819
Childhood obesity has become a global epidemic . China is one of many countries to be dramatically affected by this growing epidemic in recent years [2, 3]. Obesity has many serious health and financial consequences [4–6]. Excess body weight during adolescence not only predicts adult obesity but also influences morbidity and mortality in adult life . Treating obesity is both difficult and costly . The obesity epidemic demands urgent population-based research on childhood obesity prevention programs to determine which programmes are effective and sustainable.
Schools are critical settings for promoting lifelong healthy eating and physical activity (HEPA) [9, 10], and for preventing childhood obesity [10, 11]. Several systematic reviews [12–15] and some recent studies [16–19] have shown that school-based prevention of obesity is feasible and effective; however other studies have not shown significant effects [20–22]. Although these school-based intervention studies have generally focused on improving healthy eating behavior and the promotion of physical activity (PA), different strategic components and follow-up periods make it difficult to compare the study results. Moreover, most of these studies were conducted in Western countries, and results from Western countries may not be directly applicable to the Chinese population, given obvious differences in school activities and structures between Western and Chinese societies (e.g., Chinese school students spend much more time in academic study) . Hence, there is a need for a well-designed school-based intervention programme for obesity prevention in Chinese population.
To date, only four studies have investigated obesity prevention among school children in Mainland China, three in the language of Chinese and one in English [24–27]. These studies implemented individualized interventions focusing on controlling body weight in obese children. There is a lack of evidence concerning the effectiveness of school-based obesity prevention programs targeting overall students in China. We designed a cluster randomized controlled trial (C-RCT) to evaluate the effectiveness of a school-based comprehensive lifestyle intervention among Chinese kids against obesity (CLICK-Obesity) in 8 urban primary schools in Nanjing City, China. When designing the C-RCT we considered the unique cultural, academic and traditional aspects of Mainland China, as well as the urgent need for this type of intervention. This report presents the methodology used in this C-RCT.
Study design and recruitment of participants
The theoretical basis
The intervention component of our CLICK-Obesity study was developed based on the HEALTH-KIDS Study conducted by one of our team members in Chicago , but related changes were made to adapt to the situation in Nanjing in China. The HEALTH-KIDS intervention was designed based on several behavioral theories including the Theory of Triadic Influence (TTI)  and the Comprehensive School Health Program Model (CSHPM) by the United States of America Center for Disease Control (US CDC) , Briefly, the TTI theory was intended to account for factors that had direct and indirect effects on behavior and both new behaviors and regular behaviors, while the CSHPM model, a strategy designed for school-based behavior intervention projects, was recommended by the US CDC for school-based intervention programs to promote life-long healthy eating and physical activity habits.
Intervention components and implementation
Classroom curriculumThe classroom curriculum was designed to disseminate knowledge and skills to promote individual healthy eating behaviors and to increase inside-/outside-school physical activity. One 30-minute lesson was delivered by regular classroom teachers each month for one academic year (8 months) for the 4th graders in the intervention group. All teachers were trained and provided with the same teaching materials to present for students. Members from our program team attended each class and sat in the back of the classroom to view each curriculum presentation lesson.The curriculum consists of two education modules: one focused on nutrition and the other on physical activity. The nutrition module aimed to help students reduce unnecessarily excessive energy intake, while the physical activity module focused on increasing energy expenditure. The nutrition module included an introduction to types of foods, and energy contained in different foods and practical advice on how to eat healthily on a daily basis. Students were shown what high-dense-energy foods are, for example Western snacks, soft-drinks and deep-fried foods. They were encouraged to consume low-dense-energy foods, such as vegetables and tofu. They were also offered tips on how to eat healthily, e.g., chewing thoroughly, and reducing fat intake by consuming meat without skin. The physical activity module encouraged students to engage in sufficient physical activity and to reduce screen-time. Students were also encouraged to do exercises inside or outside of the classroom during recess, and to walk to and from school.
School environmental supportSchool environment can be critical to helping students make desirable health-related behavioral changes and maintain a healthy lifestyle. Brief health-related messages and posters were presented in all intervention schools, in locations such as inside the classroom, gymnasium, playground, and cafeteria. The messages and posters were updated monthly according to scheduled intervention themes. Furthermore, posters made by students were posted on rear blackboards in classrooms in intervention schools. The posters promoted healthy eating and physically active behaviors. Selected examples of the blackboard poster titles included: “To be physically active is a good and wise way to reject obesity”, “Healthy eating can keep obesity away” and “Indulging in foods can guarantee your bad health”. Posters were updated by students monthly.
Family involvementParents/guardians are the gatekeepers for their children’s food choices, and they also serve as role models for their children by practicing and reinforcing healthy lifestyle choices [17, 30]. Family involvement was developed to introduce families to the CLICK-Obesity intervention and to assist them to create a supportive environment for helping children change unhealthy behaviors and increase healthy eating and physical activity. The family involvement component included parents/guardians health class at school, in which they were invited to participate in an educational program twice per semester to learn appropriate strategies to advance healthy lifestyle choices against obesity. Families were given the opportunity to discuss practical aspects of the CLICK-Obesity program and to extend their knowledge on healthy lifestyle and eating behaviors. The curriculum designed for parents/guardians were organized by class teachers but presented by our team members each time, unlike the class curriculum which was presented to students by classroom teachers. After school family events were also offered, these included parent–child interactive home assignments, such as identifying high-dense-energy home foods, and practicing to measure body weight and height and to calculate body mass index.
- d)Fun programs/events
Presentation competition. Three competitions (picture painting, short paper writing and stage drama) were held in two semesters regarding (a) obesity and its associated risk to health, and (b) healthy lifestyle and behaviors against obesity in daily life. Students were encouraged to tell their own stories about healthy diet and physical activity behaviors. Picture painting, focusing on healthy lifestyle choices, and paper writing activities, focusing on healthy body weight, were implemented during the first semester. A stage drama, presenting how to keep a healthy body weight through healthy lifestyle and behaviors in daily life, was required to be presented by a classmate-team (at least two members) in the second semester. Six winners from each class were selected for each picture painting and paper writing competition, while one winner in each class was selected for stage drama show by a 7-member assessment panel, which including external experts (from the local Center for Disease Control and students’ health-care institute), teachers and classmates.
‘No unhealthy snack week’. Students were encouraged to consume no high-dense-energy snacks for a week in early March 2011, and to take regular meals and fruits at home and school. A specific card designed to reinforce positive attitude and healthy practice was delivered to each participant in order to record his/her weekly snack consumption.
‘No TV week’. In a selected week in late March 2011, we designed a program to encourage students to turn off TV at home and reduce computer-use to a minimal level at home and school. The parents/guardians received leaflets encouraging them to help their children do so at home. Students were also asked to report their daily screen-time during the week.
‘No soft drink week’. In a week in late April 2010, students were advised to refrain from consuming soft-drinks and to drink pure fresh water instead. They were also required to record their soft drink consumption during that week.
Data collection and measurement of key study variables
Anthropometric measures and interviewer-assisted questionnaire surveys were conducted at baseline (May, 2010), the first follow-up (May, 2011) and will be at the end-point follow-up (May, 2012). A structured 39-item questionnaire was designed to collect information on students' and their parents' socio-demographic characteristics, knowledge regarding obesity and its risk factors, intake of meat and vegetables/fruits, consumption of high-dense-energy snacks and soft-drinks, and physical activity. Additional information on lifestyle/behavior change was collected at the first follow-up survey. As part of the baseline survey parents/guardians completed a short questionnaire focusing on their families socio-demographic characteristics. Information collected included parental educational attainment, and family size and structure.
Anthropometry: Students’ body weight, height and waist circumference (WC) were measured by trained research staff. Students, wearing light indoor clothing and without shoes, had their weight measured to the nearest 0.1 kilograms using a beam balance scale, and height measured to the nearest 0.01 meter using a stadiometer (Wuxi Weight Factory, Wuxi, Jiangsu, China). Using a non-elastic flexible tape, WC was measured to the nearest 0.1 centimeter at the midpoint between the costal inferior and iliac crest. Each of these anthropometric variables was measured twice and the mean of the two readings for each were used in our analysis.Overweight was defined as BMI between 85th and 95th percentile value, while obesity as BMI ≥ 95th for age- and sex-specific reference data according to the recommendation for Chinese children by the Group of China Obesity Task Force . In this Report we use the term ‘excess body weight’ (EBW) to describe being overweight or obese (BMI ≥ 85th percentile value).
- (2)Study variables collected in the questionnaire survey
Socio-demographic characteristics: These included student’s age, gender, grade, school, ethnicity, parental educational attainment (classified into 3 subgroups: ≤9 yrs, >9 but ≤ 12 yrs, and ≥13 yrs), and family size and structure.
Obesity-related knowledge: A series of questions were asked regarding knowledge about obesity and its related behavioral risk factors and long-term influence of childhood obesity. All these variables were categorized as “Yes” or “No or do not know”. For example, the question about information on screen time use was “Do you think spending prolonged time in viewing TV or using the computer can result in excess body weight?”
Dietary intake: Items from a specifically validated Frequency Food Questionnaire (FFQ) were selected to gather information on dietary consumption including meat, vegetable/fruit, snack and soft-drinks . All variables will be categorized into tertiles for our analysis.
Physical activity and sedentary behavior: These were assessed using the Chinese version of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (CHN-IPAQ) . We will calculate moderate physical activity (MPA) time based on time spent in jogging and doubled the time in ball playing and swimming. Time spent on homework, sleep and commuting to/from school were also collected.
Behavior change: Students were asked questions on changes in lifestyle and behavior (dietary intake, physical activity and sedentary behavior) at first follow-up compared to the baseline survey. Responses were recorded on a 5-point Likert scale (increasing a lot, increasing a little, no change, decreasing a little, and decreasing a lot).
Power calculations were based on BMI, our primary outcome. We aimed to detect a clinically important difference of at least 0.5 kg/m2 between intervention and control groups, and assumed a standard deviation of 3.0 kg/m2. To calculate the design effect due to the cluster design of the study, we estimated the average number of participants at each school would be 150, and, based on previous research , that the ICC = 0.005; thus the design effect was 1.75. Consequently, we calculated that if 1200 students from 8 schools completed the study we would have 80% power to find a clinically important difference in BMI between the intervention and control groups, with α = 0.05 (one-sided).
Descriptive statistics were calculated. Between group difference was examined for treatment assignment and overweight status. Differences were tested using independent t-tests for continuous variables (eg, BMI) and chi-square tests for categorical variables (eg, overweight, lifestyle factors and obesity related knowledge). Multilevel regression models will be used to test for post-test group differences on the main outcome variables corrected for pre-test measurements. Data will be double entered and cleaned with EpiData 3.0 (The Epidata Association, Odense, Denmark), and managed and analyzed using SPSS 13.0 (SPSS, Chicago, Illinois). P < 0.05 is used to assess statistical significance.
The rapid economic growth and lifestyle transition that has recently taken place in Mainland China has coincided with a remarkable rise in the prevalence of overweight and obesity among children. For example, in urban areas of coastal big cities including Nanjing City, in students aged 10–12 years old, the rate of overweight and obesity was 25.5% in boys and 14.3% in girls in 2000 [3, 34]. Thus population-based obesity interventions are urgently needed in China, especially in major cities such as Nanjing. To prevent obesity it is necessary for students to maintain a good balance between energy intake and energy expenditure with sufficient consideration of children’s body growth. This can be achieved by a healthy diet and adequate daily physical activity. Our intervention aims to increase healthy eating, physical activity and to reduce sedentary behaviors among all students allocated to receive the intervention program.
Some of the social environmental factors affecting students’ energy balanced related behaviors (EBRB) in China differ from those in Western societies. For example, Chinese students have a considerably heavier study burden and spend much less time in organized sports and playing outside , this is mainly due to high level of competitiveness in Chinese schools. Generally, students' academic performance is the dominant measure used to assess schools' achievement by both students’ parents/guardians and local educational authorities. Consequently, students’ academic performance is the top priority for school principals and classroom teachers, especially as academic performance is closely linked to their achievement outcomes including financial incentives. In such Chinese social, cultural and economic context, any obesity prevention and other health promotion programs need to make a strong case to win schools’ and parents’ interest, support, and active involvement.
At present, most school-based obesity intervention programs have been conducted in Western countries, and so have limited generalizabiliy to the Chinese context [12–19, 35]. To date very few school-based obesity intervention studies targeting a reduction in obesity/overweight rates among overall students have been conducted in Mainland China [36, 37], a culturally and ethnically different society from Western communities.
This study was specifically designed to develop a feasible and effective population-based intervention program that targeted lifestyle and behavioral factors contributing to excessive weight gain in school children under the current educational context in Mainland China. There were several stages for us to undertake in the development of this study. First, based on previous data on children excess body weight and its associated risk factors in Mainland China [24–27, 34, 38], we realized the urgent need of developing an obesity intervention program tailored for Chinese school students. Second, we identified key environmental, lifestyle and behavior determinants for obesity in Chinese school children. Third, we thoroughly reviewed both English and Chinese literature, and identified potential intervention components. Fourth, we contacted researchers who have designed similar intervention trials. We had fruitful discussions with researchers, especially from the HEALTH-KIDS Study which was conducted in the United States of America . The insights gained from these discussions were very beneficial. Fifth, we consulted responsible/key persons in local educational authorities, school principals and teachers to get their ideas and suggestions on the study. For example, all educational experts consulted believed early intervention against obesity is greatly needed in China, and strongly suggested our study would be better if it was integrated into the current educational system. Sixth, we organized an international research team for this study, including experts from US and Australia. Seventh, taking into account the Chinese educational and social system and the implications from the HEALTH-KIDS study, we developed the study protocol paying particular attention to the feasibility and long-term effect of our study in the current context of Mainland China.
Our intervention program emphasized the need for multilevel interventions, including multiple intervention components that target the classroom curriculum (both healthy dieting and physical activity), school environmental support, family involvement and fun programs/events. We integrated our intervention components into schools’ academic programs, which is critical for such health intervention programs to be acceptable and feasible in China and was really crucial for us to successfully obtain sufficient support from school administrators, teachers, and students and their parents/guardians. We implemented this study with limited impact on the schools’ academic schedule.
In summary, we designed this lifestyle intervention project with due consideration of Chinese cultural and familial tradition, social convention, and current primary education and exam system in China, and the successful experience from the Chicago-based HEALTH-KIDS obesity prevention program. We did our best to gain good support from educational authorities, school administrators, teachers and parents, and to integrate intervention components into schools’ regular academic programs. The findings and experience gained in this study will help guide future school-based childhood obesity prevention programs in China as well as to provide insight for other low- and middle income countries.
FX (PI of the project) was responsible for study design, data collection and analysis, and manuscript writing; YW (Co-PI of the project), for study design and manuscript drafting; ZW, XH and AS, for data collection and manuscript revision; JL (Co-PI of the project), for study design, data collection and manuscript writing; RSW and LAT, for power calculating, manuscript writing and language editing. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
The study was supported by Nanjing Municipal Science and Technique Foundation (200901088) and Medical Science and Technique Development Foundation (2009-ZKX09034) and the Nanjing CDC. FX was also supported by The Jiangsu Provincial Government Scholarship for Overseas Studies (JS-2010-109). YW’s related effort is supported by research grants from The National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK, R01 DK63383) and The Nestle Foundation and a Research and Training Center grant (U54HD070725) from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health & Human Development (NICHD), which is co-funded by the NICHD and the Behavioral and Social Sciences Research (OBSSR). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the funders.
Our special thanks go to the following people for their support: Zhou Jiandong (Nanhu No.3 Primary School), Li Lixin (Nanhu No.1 Primary School), Wang Kerong (Mochouhu Primary School), Du Wenyan (Aoti Primary School), Zhou Jie (Jiangdongmen Primary School), Gai Jingsong (Nanhu No. 2 Primary School), Jiang Haihong (Xiaozhuang No.1 Experimental Primary School), Lou Wei (Zhiyuan Foreign Language Primary School), all the students and their parents/guardians.
- Wang Y, Lobstein T: Worldwide trends in childhood obesity. Int J Pediatr Obes. 2006, 1: 11-25. 10.1080/17477160600586747.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wang Y, Mi J, Shan X, Wang QJ, Ge K: Is China facing an obesity epidemic and the consequences? The trends in obesity and chronic disease in China. Int J Obes. 2007, 31 (1): 177-188. 10.1038/sj.ijo.0803354.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ji CY, Cheng TO: Prevalence and geographic distribution of childhood obesity in China in 2005. Int J Cardiol. 2008, 131 (1): 1-8. 10.1016/j.ijcard.2008.05.078.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zhao W, Zhai Y, Hu J, Wang J, Yang Z, Kong L, Chen C: Economic burden of obesity-related chronic diseases in Mainland China. Obes Rev. 2008, 9 (Suppl 1): 62-67.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wang Y, Beydoun MA, Liang L, Caballero B, Kumanyika SK: Will all Americans become overweight or obese? Estimating the progression and cost of the US obesity epidemic. Obesity. 2008, 16 (10): 2323-2330. 10.1038/oby.2008.351.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- World Health Organization: Reducing Risks, Promoting Healthy Life. The World Health Report 2002. 2002, World Health Organization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
- Serdula MK, Ivery D, Coates RJ, Freedman DS, Williamson DF, Byers T: Do obese children become obese adults? A review of the literature. Prev Med. 1993, 22: 167-177. 10.1006/pmed.1993.1014.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Seidell JC: The current epidemic of obesity. In Physical Activity and Obesity. Edited by: Bouchard C. 2000, Human Kinetics, ChampaignGoogle Scholar
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Guidelines for school and community programs to promote lifelong physical activity among young people. MMWR. 1997, 46: 1-36.Google Scholar
- Flynn MA, McNeil DA, Maloff B, Mutasingwa D, Wu M, Ford C, Tough SC: Reducing obesity and related chronic disease risk in children and youth: a synthesis of evidence with 'best practice' recommendations. Obes Rev. 2006, 7: S7-S66. 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2006.00242.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- World Health Organization: What can be done to fight the childhood obesity epidemic?. Accessed May 20, 2010, [http://www.who.int/dietphysicalactivity/childhood_what can be done/en/index.html.]
- Summerbell C, Waters E, Edmunds L, Kelly S, Brown T, Campbell K: Interventions for preventing obesity in children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005, 20 (3): 1-70. CD001871Google Scholar
- Van Sluijs EM, McMinn AM, Griffin SJ: Effectiveness of interventions to promote physical activity in children and adolescents: systematic review of controlled trials. BMJ. 2007, 335: 703-10.1136/bmj.39320.843947.BE.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Doak CM, Visscher TLS, Renders CM, Seidell JC: The prevention of overweight and obesity in children and adolescents: a review of interventions and programmes. Obes Rev. 2006, 7: 111-136. 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2006.00234.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Flodmark CE, Marcus C, Britton M: Interventions to prevent obesity in children and adolescents: a systematic literature review. Int J Obes (Lond). 2006, 30: 579-589. 10.1038/sj.ijo.0803290.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jansen W, Raat H, Zwanenburg EJ, Reuvers I, Walsem RV, Brug J: A school-based intervention to reduce overweight and inactivity in children aged 6–2 years: study design of a randomized controlled trial. BMC Public Health. 2008, 8: 257-10.1186/1471-2458-8-257.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Wang Y, Tussing L, Odoms-Young A, Braunschweig C, Flay B, Hedeker D, Hellison D: Obesity prevention in low socioeconomic status urban African-American adolescents: study design and preliminary findings of the HEALTH-KIDS Study. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2006, 60: 92-103. 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602272.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Singh AS, Chin A, Paw MJ, Brug J, van Mechelen W: Dutch obesity intervention in teenagers: effectiveness of a school-based program on body composition and behavior. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2009, 163: 309-317. 10.1001/archpediatrics.2009.2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Brug J, te Velde SJ, Chin A, Paw MJ, Bere E, de Bourdeaudhuij I, Moore H, Maes L, Jensen J, Manios Y, Lien N, Klepp KI, Lobstein T, Martens M, Salmon J, Singh AS: Evidence-based development of school-based and family-involved prevention of overweight across Europe: the ENERGY-project's design and conceptual framework. BMC Public Health. 2010, 10: 276-10.1186/1471-2458-10-276.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Caballero B, Clay T, Davis SM, Ethelbah B, Rock BH, Lohman T, Norman J, Story M, Stone EJ, Stephenson L, Stevens J: Pathways: a school-based, randomized controlled trial for the prevention of obesity in American Indian schoolchildren. Am J Clin Nutr. 2003, 78 (5): 1030-1038.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Paradis G, Levesque L, Macaulay AC, Cargo M, McComber A, Kirby R: Impact of a diabetes prevention program on body size, physical activity, and diet among kanien’keha:ka (mohawk) children 6 to 11 years old: 8-year results from the kahnawake schools diabetes prevention project. Pediatrics. 2005, 115 (2): 333-339. 10.1542/peds.2004-0745.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Connor MK, Smith LG, Fryer A, Erickson S, Fryer S, Drake J: Future Fit: a cardiovascular health education and fitness project in an after-school setting. J Sch Health. 1986, 56 (8): 329-333. 10.1111/j.1746-1561.1986.tb05764.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yang XZ, Liu BC: Cross-sectional comparison of study burden among students in different countries. Shanghai Education & Research. 2002, 4: 58-61. In ChineseGoogle Scholar
- He XW: Comprehensive intervention and treatment on simple obesity among school children. Journal of Guangxi Medical University. 2003, 20: 406-407. In ChineseGoogle Scholar
- Liu SQ, Zhang QH, Yue YL, Li YQ: School-based intervention for obese children. Chinese Journal of School Doctor. 2005, 19: 115-117. In ChineseGoogle Scholar
- Xia GX, Zhong N, Xu XP, Wang RQ: Lifestyle intervention in obese Children in Longhua Shanghai. Chinese Journal of School Health. 2003, 24: 359-In ChineseGoogle Scholar
- Jiang J, Xia X, Greiner T, Wu G, Lian G, Rosenqvist U: The effects of a 3-year obesity intervention in school children in Beijing. Child Care Health Dev. 2007, 33 (5): 641-646. 10.1111/j.1365-2214.2007.00738.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Flay BR, Petraitis J: The theory of triadic influence: a new theory of health behavior with implications for preventive interventions. Advances in Medical Sociology, Vol IV: A Reconsideration of Models of Health Behavior Change. Edited by: Albrecht GS. 1994, JAI Press, Greenwich, 19-44.Google Scholar
- Allensworth DD, Kolbe LJ: The comprehensive school health program: exploring an expanded concept. J School Health. 1987, 57: 409-412. 10.1111/j.1746-1561.1987.tb03183.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Birch LL, Davison KK: Family environmental factors influencing the developing behavioral controls of food intake and childhood overweight. Pediatr Clin N Am. 2001, 48: 893-907. 10.1016/S0031-3955(05)70347-3.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Group of China Obesity Task force: Body mass index for reference norm for screening overweight and obesity in Chinese children and adolescents. Chin J Epidemiol. 2004, 25: 97-102.Google Scholar
- Xu LZ, Dibley MJ, D'Este C: Reliability and validity of a food-frequency questionnaire for Chinese postmenopausal women. Public Health Nutr. 2004, 7: 91-98.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Qu NN, Li KJ: Study on the reliability and validity of the international physical activity questionnaire (Chinese Version). Chin J Epidemiol. 2004, 25: 265-268.Google Scholar
- Ji CY, Sun JL, Chen TJ: Dynamic analysis on the prevalence of obesity and overweight school-age children and adolescents in recent 15 years in China. Chin J Epidemiol. 2004, 25: 103-108.Google Scholar
- Baranowski T, Cullen KW, Nicklas T, Thompson D, Baranowski J: School-based obesity prevention: a blueprint for taming the epidemic. Am J Health Behav. 2002, 26a: 486-493.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Li M, Li S, Baur LA, Huxley RR: A systematic review of school-based intervention studies for the prevention or reduction of excess weight among Chinese children and adolescents. Obesity review. 2008, 9: 548-559. 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2008.00495.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gao Y, Griffiths S, Chan EY: Community-based interventions to reduce overweight and obesity in China: a systematic review of the Chinese and English literature. J Public Health. 2008, 30 (4): 436-448. 10.1093/pubmed/fdm057.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Xu F, Li JQ, Ware R, Owen N: Associations of television viewing time with excess body weight among urban and rural high school students in regional mainland China. Public Health Nutr. 2008, 11 (09): 891-896.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/12/316/prepub