A community-based participatory approach and engagement process creates culturally appropriate and community informed pandemic plans after the 2009 H1N1 influenza pandemic: remote and isolated First Nations communities of sub-arctic Ontario, Canada
© Charania and Tsuji; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 13 October 2011
Accepted: 3 April 2012
Published: 3 April 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|13 Oct 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|11 Nov 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Peter Massey|
|15 Dec 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Nadia Inglis|
|30 Jan 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Nadia Charania|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|30 Jan 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|30 Jan 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Peter Massey|
|12 Feb 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Nadia Inglis|
|25 Feb 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Nadia Charania|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|25 Feb 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|12 Mar 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Nadia Inglis|
|20 Mar 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Nadia Charania|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|20 Mar 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|3 Apr 2012||Editorially accepted|
|3 Apr 2012||Article published||10.1186/1471-2458-12-268|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.