Lessons from a one-year hospital-based surveillance of acute respiratory infections in Berlin- comparing case definitions to monitor influenza
© Nachtnebel et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 12 September 2011
Accepted: 27 March 2012
Published: 27 March 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|12 Sep 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|5 Oct 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Amparo Larrauri|
|20 Oct 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - James Fielding|
|30 Jan 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Matthias Nachtnebel|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|30 Jan 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|14 Feb 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Amparo Larrauri|
|24 Feb 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - James Fielding|
|8 Mar 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Matthias Nachtnebel|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|8 Mar 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|27 Mar 2012||Editorially accepted|
|27 Mar 2012||Article published||10.1186/1471-2458-12-245|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.