Keeping participants on board: increasing uptake by automated respondent reminders in an Internet-based Chlamydia Screening in the Netherlands
© Dokkum et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 6 October 2011
Accepted: 9 March 2012
Published: 9 March 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|6 Oct 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|10 Nov 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jennifer Walker|
|25 Nov 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jessica Sheringham|
|27 Dec 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Eline Op de Coul|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|27 Dec 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|16 Jan 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jennifer Walker|
|30 Jan 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jessica Sheringham|
|20 Feb 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Eline Op de Coul|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|20 Feb 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|24 Feb 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Eline Op de Coul|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|24 Feb 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|9 Mar 2012||Editorially accepted|
|9 Mar 2012||Article published||10.1186/1471-2458-12-176|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.