Skip to main content


Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Lifetime history of indoor tanning in young people: a retrospective assessment of initiation, persistence, and correlates

  • Karen Lostritto1,
  • Leah M Ferrucci1,
  • Brenda Cartmel1, 2,
  • David J Leffell2, 3,
  • Annette M Molinaro1, 2,
  • Allen E Bale2, 3 and
  • Susan T Mayne1, 2Email author
Contributed equally
BMC Public Health201212:118

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-118

Received: 21 December 2011

Accepted: 10 February 2012

Published: 10 February 2012

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting

Original Submission
21 Dec 2011 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
13 Jan 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Hiram de Almeida Jr
17 Jan 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Alexander Katalinic
25 Jan 2012 Author responded Author comments - Leah Ferrucci
Resubmission - Version 3
25 Jan 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
10 Feb 2012 Editorially accepted
10 Feb 2012 Article published 10.1186/1471-2458-12-118

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

Yale School of Public Health
Yale Cancer Center
Yale University School of Medicine