Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
2 Mar 2012 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
5 Mar 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Ellen van Kleef |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
5 Mar 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
6 Apr 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Ellen van Kleef |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
6 Apr 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
2 Aug 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Marijn Stok |
9 Aug 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Emely De Vet |
5 Nov 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Ellen van Kleef |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
5 Nov 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
8 Nov 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Marijn Stok |
19 Nov 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Emely De Vet |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
Publishing | ||
22 Nov 2012 | Editorially accepted | |
12 Dec 2012 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2458-12-1072 |
You can find further information about peer review here.