Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Understanding non-return after a temporary deferral from giving blood: a qualitative study

  • Tessa L Hillgrove1Email author,
  • Kathleen V Doherty2, 3 and
  • Vivienne M Moore1
BMC Public Health201212:1063

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-1063

Received: 9 December 2011

Accepted: 31 August 2012

Published: 10 December 2012

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
9 Dec 2011 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
25 Jan 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Brian Custer
2 Feb 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Pippa Grenfell
3 May 2012 Author responded Author comments - Tessa Hillgrove
Resubmission - Version 3
3 May 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
24 May 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Pippa Grenfell
7 Aug 2012 Author responded Author comments - Tessa Hillgrove
Resubmission - Version 4
7 Aug 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
31 Aug 2012 Editorially accepted
10 Dec 2012 Article published 10.1186/1471-2458-12-1063

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Discipline of Public Health, University of Adelaide
(2)
Australian Red Cross Blood Service
(3)
University of Tasmania

Advertisement