Risk factors for VIA positivity and determinants of screening attendances in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
© Kahesa et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 9 April 2012
Accepted: 3 December 2012
Published: 7 December 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|9 Apr 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|18 May 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Elisabete Weiderpass|
|21 May 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ju-Fang Shi|
|1 Jun 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Megan Smith|
|8 Jun 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Dorota Gertig|
|12 Aug 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Vibeke Rasch|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|12 Aug 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|13 Sep 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Megan Smith|
|12 Nov 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Vibeke Rasch|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|12 Nov 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|3 Dec 2012||Editorially accepted|
|7 Dec 2012||Article published||10.1186/1471-2458-12-1055|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.