Skip to main content

Table 4 Adjusted odds ratios for current perception of high risk of acquiring HIV among mobile FSWs in Southern India

From: Relationship between reported prior condom use and current self-perceived risk of acquiring HIV among mobile female sex workers in southern India

Characteristics

Model I

Model II

Model III

Model IV

 

Adjusted OR

(95% CI)

Adjusted OR

(95% CI)

Adjusted OR

(95% CI)

Adjusted OR

(95% CI)

Condom use in past one week with occasional clients

    

Consistent

 

1

 

1

Inconsistent

 

2.85 (2.31 -3.51)

 

2.07 (1.65 -2.60)

No client

 

0.84 (0.41 -1.71)

 

0.95 (0.45 -1.97)

Condom use in past one week with regular clients

    

Consistent

 

1

 

1

Inconsistent

 

1.16 (0.95 -1.42)

 

0.99 (0.79 -1.22)

No client

 

0.92 (0.66 - 1.27)

 

0.91 (0.64 -1.29)

Condom use in past one week with non paying partners

    

Consistent

 

1

 

1

Inconsistent

 

0.56 (0.43 -0.72)

 

0.65 (0.49 -0.86)

No partner

 

0.32 (0.26 -0.38)

 

0.52 (0.42 -0.64)

STI symptoms in last six months & use of condom

    

No STI symptom

  

1

1

No sex during STI symptom

  

2.68 (2.31 -3.11)

2.36 (2.02 -2.75)

Continued sex during STI symptom

  

6.76 (5.56 - 8.23)

5.70 (4.66 - 6.98)

Used alcohol prior to sex

    

No

  

1

1

Yes

  

2.36 (2.04 – 2.71)

2.20 (1.90 – 2.54)

Reason for entering in to sex work

    

Choice/tradition

  

1

1

Economic/force

  

1.39 (1.12 -1.72)

1.39 (1.12 -1.72)

Sex work

    

Full time

  

1

1

Part time

  

1.51 (1.31 -1.75)

1.37 (1.18 -1.59)

State

    

Tamil Nadu

1

1

1

1

Andhra Pradesh

2.84 (1.43 - 5.66)

2.97 (1.50 -5.89)

1.91 (0.89 - 4.10)

2.16 (1.02 - 4.60)

Karnataka

1.98 (0.99 - 3.93)

1.30 (0.65 - 2.60)

1.59 (0.73 - 3.44)

1.28 (0.59 - 2.78)

Maharashtra

0.37 (0.19 - 0.71)

0.48 (0.25 - 0.93)

0.38 (0.18 - 0.79)

0.45 (0.22 - 0.93)

Random component

    

District (SD)

0.54 (0.38 - 0.75)

0.54 (0.38 - 0.74)

0.59 (0.42 - 0.83)

0.58 (0.42 - 0.81)

Regression statistics

    

Log likelihood

-3288.778

-3128.85

-2896.539

-2854.597

Districts

22

22

22

22

N

5413

5413

5413

5413

  1. Note:
  2. 1. The estimated standard deviation (SD) of the district variable without the state variable was 0.99.
  3. 2. Experience of sexual violence, living arrangements, currently in debt, degree of mobility, age, education, and marital status were also included as covariates in Models II and IV. Adjusted odds ratios for these covariates (except age) were not significant at 5% level of significance.