Volume 11 Supplement 3

Technical inputs, enhancements and applications of the Lives Saved Tool (LiST)

Open Access

Role of calcium supplementation during pregnancy in reducing risk of developing gestational hypertensive disorders: a meta-analysis of studies from developing countries

BMC Public Health201111(Suppl 3):S18

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-S3-S18

Published: 13 April 2011

Abstract

Background

Hypertension in pregnancy stand alone or with proteinuria is one of the leading causes of maternal mortality and morbidity in the world. Epidemiological and clinical studies have shown that an inverse relationship exists between calcium intake and development of hypertension in pregnancy though the effect varies based on baseline calcium intake and pre-existing risk factors. The purpose of this review was to evaluate preventive effect of calcium supplementation during pregnancy on gestational hypertensive disorders and related maternal and neonatal mortality in developing countries.

Methods

A literature search was carried out on PubMed, Cochrane Library and WHO regional databases. Data were extracted into a standardized excel sheet. Identified studies were graded based on strengths and limitations of studies. All the included studies were from developing countries. Meta-analyses were generated where data were available from more than one study for an outcome. Primary outcomes were maternal mortality, eclampsia, pre-eclampsia, and severe preeclampsia. Neonatal outcomes like neonatal mortality, preterm birth, small for gestational age and low birth weight were also evaluated. We followed standardized guidelines of Child Health Epidemiology Reference Group (CHERG) to generate estimates of effectiveness of calcium supplementation during pregnancy in reducing maternal and neonatal mortality in developing countries, for inclusion in the Lives Saved Tool (LiST).

Results

Data from 10 randomized controlled trials were included in this review. Pooled analysis showed that calcium supplementation during pregnancy was associated with a significant reduction of 45% in risk of gestational hypertension [Relative risk (RR) 0.55; 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.36-0.85] and 59% in the risk of pre-eclampsia [RR 0.41; 95 % CI 0.24-0.69] in developing countries. Calcium supplementation during pregnancy was also associated with a significant reduction in neonatal mortality [RR 0.70; 95 % CI 0.56-0.88] and risk of pre-term birth [RR 0.88, 95 % CI 0.78-0.99]. Recommendations for LiST for reduction in maternal mortality were based on risk reduction in gestational hypertensive related severe morbidity/mortality [RR 0.80; 95% CI 0.70-0.91] and that for neonatal mortality were based on risk reduction in all-cause neonatal mortality [RR 0.70; 95% CI 0.56-0.88].

Conclusion

Calcium supplementation during pregnancy is associated with a reduction in risk of gestational hypertension, pre-eclampsia neonatal mortality and pre-term birth in developing countries.

Background

Hypertension in pregnancy stand alone or with proteinuria is one of the leading causes of maternal mortality and morbidity in the world [1]. Hypertensive disorders are the second most common cause of maternal deaths worldwide [2] and account for more than 40,000 maternal deaths annually [3]. These disorders are also associated with adverse perinatal outcomes such as stillbirth, preterm and small for gestational age babies [46].

Epidemiological and clinical studies have shown that an inverse relationship exists between calcium intake and development of hypertension in pregnancy [4, 7]. Many trials have been conducted to observe the protective effect of preventive calcium supplementation in pregnant women [8]. There is substantial data that supports that calcium supplementation in pregnancy is associated with reduction in gestational hypertensive disorder [9, 10], although the impact varies according to the baseline calcium intake of the population and pre-existing risk factors [8, 11].

A previous review by Hofmyer et al. has shown that calcium supplementation during pregnancy had a significant effect in reducing risk of gestational hypertension and pre-eclampsia [10]. This effect was more prominent in those studies where participants had low baseline calcium intake compared to that of adequate calcium intake [10]. Another review by Trumbo et al. had shown that beneficial effects of calcium supplementation cannot be generalized to USA population and suggested that beneficial effects could only be shown in populations whose baseline calcium intake is inadequate [11].

The objective of this review was to evaluate the effect of calcium supplementation during pregnancy in reducing maternal hypertensive disorders and related maternal and neonatal mortality and morbidity in developing countries. This paper is a part of series of papers for Lives Saved Tool (LiST) model. An intervention is currently included in the LiST if there is substantial evidence that it decrease maternal mortality, neonatal/child mortality and/or stillbirths [12]. This process is guided by qualitative assessment of available evidence according to Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) criteria [13] and quantitative inputs according to Child Health Epidemiology Reference Group (CHERG) guidelines [12]. For more details of the review methods, the adapted GRADE approach or the LiST model, see the methods and results section and other articles in this supplement.

Methods

Searching

To identify studies that evaluated the effect of calcium supplementation during pregnancy for prevention of gestational hypertensive disorders, a comprehensive search of PubMed, Cochrane Library and WHO regional databases was carried out using different terms for calcium and gestational hypertensive disorders. Following search strategy was used for PubMed; (“Calcium” AND “pregnancy”) AND (“Hypertension” OR “pre-eclampsia” OR “blood pressure” OR “neonatal death” OR “preterm “OR “low birth weight”). The search was limited to “randomized trial” and “humans”. Studies were considered for inclusion irrespective of language or status of publication. The date of last search was March 22, 2010. Additional studies were obtained through hand search of references from identified studies and previous reviews.

Inclusion/exclusion criteria

All published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in which pregnant women received calcium supplementation as compared to control (placebo or no intervention) were included. Observational studies were not considered for inclusion as we expected to have reasonable number of RCTs for inclusion in the review. Trials which included participants diagnosed with hypertension prior to pregnancy were excluded. Supplementation started with calcium before 32 weeks of pregnancy at the latest. As per objectives of LiST model, all the included studies were from developing countries [12]. The developing countries were defined as countries with Gross National Income per capita (GNI) below US$11,905, according to World Bank[14]. High blood pressure was taken as defined by authors mostly as diastolic blood pressure equal to or greater than 90 mmHg, or an increase in systolic blood pressure of 30 mmHg or more, or in diastolic blood pressure of 15 mmHg or more from the baseline. Pre-eclampsia was defined as high blood pressure plus significant proteinuria (as defined by authors). Ideally, a proteinuria of 1+ or greater by dipstick testing, equal to or greater than 300 mg per 24 hours, or equal to or greater than 500mg per liter is taken as significant proteinuria [15]. Gestational hypertension was defined as high blood pressure developed during pregnancy ± proteinuria (not significant enough to define as pre-eclampsia). Definition of severe pre-eclampsia was also followed as defined by authors usually as systolic blood pressure ≥ 160 and/or diastolic blood pressure ≥110 or more on 2 occasions 4 hours apart plus proteinuria (3+ on urine dipstick) [15]. Eclampsia was defined as the development of convulsions and/or unexplained coma during pregnancy or postpartum in patients with signs and symptoms of preeclampsia after 20 weeks pre-partum and before 48 hours postpartum [15].

Data abstraction and quality assessment

All the included trials were assessed for methodological quality and outcomes of interest using a standardized form [12]. Data were abstracted for study design, study site, methods of sequence generation, allocation concealment, attrition and primary outcomes of interest. Individual studies were evaluated according to CHERG adaptation of GRADE technique [12, 13]. In this method of qualitative evaluation, all RCTs received an initial score of ‘high’ and an observational study as ‘low’. The study scores were adjusted depending on limitations of the study design. Trials with a final grade of ‘high’ or ‘moderate’ and ‘low grade’ were included in the analysis with exclusion of studies with a final grade of ‘very low’[12].

Quantitative data synthesis

The primary outcomes assessed were maternal mortality, gestational hypertension (± proteinuria), pre-eclampsia, severe pre-eclampsia and eclampsia. Data on neonatal outcomes like neonatal mortality, preterm birth, low birth weight and birth of small-for-gestational age were also extracted. Pooled analyses were conducted where data were available from more than one study for an outcome. The results are presented as risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The assessment of statistical heterogeneity among trials was done by visual inspection i.e. the overlap of the confidence intervals among the studies, and by the Chi square (P-value) of heterogeneity in the meta-analyses. A low P value (less than 0.10) or a large chi-squared statistic relative to its degree of freedom was considered as providing evidence of heterogeneity. The I2 values were also looked into and I2 values greater than 50% were taken as substantial and high heterogeneity. In situations of substantial or high heterogeneity being present, causes were explored by sensitivity analysis and random effects model were used. Although random model is not a substitute for a thorough investigation of heterogeneity, it takes an ‘average’ effect from all the included studies compared to fixed models that take the exact contribution from the individual studies [16].It is thus preferred in case of significant heterogeneity in pooled estimate. All analyses were conducted using software Rev Man version 5 [17]. We did a subgroup analysis based on a priori hypothesis that calcium supplementation during pregnancy would be more effective in reducing hypertensive disorders in pregnant women who are at increased risk for developing gestational hypertensive disorders. Participants were defined as being at a higher risk of developing hypertension in pregnancy in case of teenage pregnancy, women with previous pre-eclampsia, and women with positive roll over test and/or positive angiotension II sensitivity test [10]. We applied CHERG rules to collective maternal and neonatal mortality and morbidity outcomes related to maternal hypertensive disorders [12]. The purpose of this exercise was to get a point estimate for effectiveness of calcium supplementation during pregnancy in reducing maternal and neonatal mortality due to hypertensive disorders.

Results

Trial flow

Literature search of electronic databases, and papers from hand searches yielded a total number of 1402 titles after removal of duplicates (Figure 1). Initially 29 studies were considered for inclusion in the review. Out of these seven studies were excluded due to insufficient data on outcomes of interest [1824]. Three studies were excluded due to very low grade quality [2527]. In two trials, calcium was supplemented as therapeutic intervention and not as preventive [28, 29]. Two studies were excluded because calcium was supplemented in combination, either with linoleic acid [30] or L-aspartate [31] and it was not possible to separate out their effect from calcium supplementation. Five studies were excluded because they were conducted in developed countries [3236].Finally 10 studies that met our inclusion criteria were included in the review [3746].
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2458-11-S3-S18/MediaObjects/12889_2011_Article_2954_Fig1_HTML.jpg
Figure 1

Flow diagram for identification of studies evaluating calcium supplementation during pregnancy for prevention of maternal hypertensive disorders

Study characteristics

All the included studies were randomized controlled trials with comparison group receiving a placebo in all except in two studies in which participants of comparison group were simply observed as controls [45, 46]. Table 1 presents characteristics of included studies. The starting period of calcium supplementation in all the included studies was before 20-32 weeks of gestation and continued till delivery. In three of the included studies [39, 40, 42], the participants were defined as being at a higher risk of developing hypertension in pregnancy (pregnant teenage girls, women with previous pre-eclampsia or women with positive roll over test). The dose of calcium ranged from 0.5 g/day to 2 g/day. Five of the included studies were from Asia [38, 42, 43, 45, 46] and four from South America [37, 3941]. One large multicentre trial was conducted by World Health Organization (WHO) in Argentina, Egypt, India, Peru, South Africa and Vietnam [44].
Table 1

Characteristics of included studies

Study (ref)

Country

Target population

Baseline Calcium intake as Low

(< 900 mg/day), Adequate (>900g/day), Not specified)

Dose of Supplementation

(Cumulative dose)

Duration of supplementation

GRADE quality

Belizan et al 1991[37]

Argentina

Nulliparous pregnant women, < 20 weeks gestation. No comorbid

Low

2 g/day

< 20 weeks of pregnancy till delivery

High

Kumar et al 2009 [38]

India

Primigravida women with gestational age between 12-25 weeks

Low

2 g/day

12-25 weeks of pregnancy till delivery

High

L-Jaramillo et al. 1989[41]

Ecuador

Nulliparous pregnant women, < 24 weeks of gestation.

No comorbid

Low

2 g/day

23 weeks of pregnancy till delivery

Moderate

L-Jaramillo et al. 1990[40]

Ecuador

Nulliparous pregnant women in 28-30 weeks of gestation with positive roll over test

Low

2 g/day

28-30 weeks of pregnancy till delivery

Moderate

L-Jaramillo et al.1997[39]

Ecuador

Teenage (< 17.5 years) Nulliparous pregnant women < 20 weeks gestation. No comorbids or addiction

Low

2 g/day

20 weeks of pregnancy till delivery

High

Niromanesh et al. 2001[42]

Turkey

28-32 weeks pregnant women with positive roll over test and with at least one risk factor for pre-eclampsia. No chronic medical condition

Not specified

2 g/day

28-32 weeks of pregnancy till delivery

High

Purwar et al. 1996[43]

India

Nulliparous pregnant women < 20 weeks of gestation. No cormorbid

Low

2 g/day

20 weeks of pregnancy till delivery

High

Villar et al. 2006 [44]

Multicenter trial (Argentina, Egypt, India, Peru, South Africa and Vietnam)

Primiparous women < 20 weeks of gestation. No comorbids

Low

1.5 g/day

From enrollment till delivery

High

Taherian et al. 2002[46]

Iran

Nulliparous pregnant women < 20 weeks of gestation. No comrbids

Low

500 mg/day

From enrollment till delivery

Moderate

Wanchu et al. 2001[45]

India

Nulliparous pregnant women < 20 weeks of gestation. No known comorbids

Low

2 g/day

From enrollment till delivery

Moderate

Quantitative data synthesis

Maternal mortality

Data on cause specific maternal mortality (i.e. due to gestational hypertensive disorders) were not available in any of the included studies. The outcome of all-cause maternal death was reported by only one study [44], with 1 death occurring in the intervention group and 6 deaths in the control group (RR 0.17; 95% CI 0.03-0.76).The overall quality grade for this outcome was that of ‘low’ level due to very low number of events. In the same study, a cumulative outcome for severe maternal morbidity/mortality was also reported. It included all the severe morbidities related to maternal hypertensive disorders that can lead to maternal death [44]. These morbidities include: admission to intensive or special care unit, eclampsia, severe pre-eclampsia, placental abruption, HELLP (hemolysis, elevated liver enzyme and low platelet count) syndrome, renal failure and maternal death. Maternal calcium supplementation during pregnancy showed a significant reduction in the intervention compared to control (RR 0.80; 95 % CI 0.70-0.91). The overall quality grade for this outcome was that of ‘moderate’ level.

Eclampsia

One large trial [44] reported outcome on eclampsia. The trials reported 17 cases of eclampsia in 4151 participants of calcium group and 25 cases in 4161 participants of control group giving a relative risk of 0.68 (95 % CI 0.48-0.97). A quality grade of ‘low’ was assigned due to low number (<50 events) of events in the intervention and control group.

Severe pre-eclampsia

The outcome of severe pre-eclampsia was reported by three included trials [4446] with a 30% reduction in calcium group compared to control, however the results were not statistically significant [(RR 0.70; 95% CI 0.46-1.05) (Figure 2). There were a total of 4531 participants in calcium group and 4541 participants in control group. There was no heterogeneity in the pooled data. The overall quality grade for this estimate was that of ‘moderate’ level due to lack of placebo in two studies and confidence interval including unity. We did not perform any subgroup analysis for this outcome due to fewer numbers of studies reporting this outcome.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2458-11-S3-S18/MediaObjects/12889_2011_Article_2954_Fig2_HTML.jpg
Figure 2

Effect of calcium supplementation during pregnancy on risk of development of severe pre-eclampsia in developing countries:

Pre-eclampsia

The impact of calcium supplementation during pregnancy on risk of pre-eclampsia was reported in 10 studies [3746]. The analysis comprising 5697 women in intervention group and 5708 women in control group showed a reduction of 59% [RR 0.41; 95 % CI 0.24-0.69, random model] in the intervention group compared to control (Figure 3). On visual inspection of the forest plot, five of the included studies were showing a clear benefit. There was a substantial heterogeneity in the pooled data (I2=74), so the random models were used. The reduction was more marked in participants with a higher pre-pregnancy risk of developing gestational hypertensive disorders [RR 0.18, 95 % CI 0.07-0.42, random model] compared to that of low risk women [RR 0.51, 95 % CI 0.30-0.87]. The overall quality grade for reduction in risk of pre-eclampsia was that of ‘High’ level.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2458-11-S3-S18/MediaObjects/12889_2011_Article_2954_Fig3_HTML.jpg
Figure 3

Effect of calcium supplementation during pregnancy on risk of development of pre-eclampsia in developing countries

Gestational hypertension (± proteinuria)

The effect of calcium supplementation on gestational hypertension (± proteinuria) was assessed in six studies from developing countries [37, 4044]. A random effect model pooled analysis showed a significant reduction of 45 % in risk of development of gestational hypertension in women receiving calcium supplementation (4919 women in calcium group) as compared to those receiving control (4942 women in control group) [RR 0.55; 95 % CI 0.36-0.85] .On visual inspection of forest plot, four of the included studies were showing a clear benefit in favor of intervention (Figure 4). There was a significant heterogeneity in the pooled data (I2=82%) and the random models were used. The overall grade quality for this estimate was that of ‘High’ level. Women who were at higher risk of development of hypertension during pregnancy seems to have a more prominent preventive effect of calcium supplementation [RR 0.32, 95 % CI 0.06-1.63] compared to those at lower risk [RR 0.64, 95 % CI 0.39-1.05], however the results were not statistically significant for both the subgroups (Figure 4).
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2458-11-S3-S18/MediaObjects/12889_2011_Article_2954_Fig4_HTML.jpg
Figure 4

Effect of calcium supplementation during pregnancy on risk of development of gestational hypertension (±proteinuria) in developing countries

Neonatal outcomes

One study reported effect of calcium supplementation during pregnancy on neonatal mortality [44]. There was a significant reduction of 30 % in the intervention group compared to placebo (RR 0.70; 95 % CI 0.56-0.88). Data on preterm births were included from five trials [37, 38, 40, 43, 44] and the pooled analysis showed a significant reduction of 12% (RR 0.88; 95% CI 0.78-0.99) in the intervention group compared to control (Figure 5). The overall grade for this estimate was that of ‘high level’. The outcome of risk of low birth weight in newborn was reported in three trials [37, 38, 44] showing no impact of calcium supplementation compared to control (RR 0.81 95% CI 0.58-1.12) (Figure 6). Combined data from two studies [43, 44] showed a non-significant reduction in risk of small for gestational babies (RR 0.90; 95 % 0.59-1.38) (data not shown). The overall quality grade for both of the above estimates was that of ‘moderate’ level.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2458-11-S3-S18/MediaObjects/12889_2011_Article_2954_Fig5_HTML.jpg
Figure 5

Effect of calcium supplementation during pregnancy on risk of preterm birth in developing countries

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2458-11-S3-S18/MediaObjects/12889_2011_Article_2954_Fig6_HTML.jpg
Figure 6

Effect of calcium supplementation during pregnancy on risk of Low Birth Weight (< 2500 g)

Recommendations for LiST

We followed standardized guidelines of Child Health Epidemiology Reference Group (CHERG) to get a point estimate for effectiveness of calcium supplementation during pregnancy in reducing maternal and neonatal mortality related to gestational hypertensive disorders in developing countries [12]. These rules were applied to collective mortality and morbidity outcomes to get a most appropriate estimate for inclusion in the LiST model. The final decision about the best estimate is based on three components 1) the volume and consistency of the evidence 2) the size of risk ratio and 3) the strength of the statistical evidence for an association between the intervention and outcome, as reflected by the p-value [12]. More details about application of CHERG rules are provided in the methods paper [12].

Additional File 1 details the quality assessment of the calcium supplementation trials on maternal and neonatal outcomes. Table 2 presents the application of CHERG rules applied to collective maternal mortality and morbidity outcomes. The data on maternal mortality was reported in only one study [44], with a total of 7 events in both arms, which could not be used due to number of events being less than 50 (Rule 1) [12]. Therefore, severe morbidity outcomes were considered. Considering the direction of effect, value of effect size and statistical significance of the estimates, reduction in severe maternal morbidity/mortality was chosen for inclusion in the LiST (Rule 3).This combined outcome was reported by one study and included severe gestational hypertensive related morbidities that can lead to maternal mortality [44]. The qualitative assessment of this estimate was that of ‘moderate’ level however downgraded to ‘low’ to translate it to maternal mortality[47]. To estimate the effectiveness of calcium supplementation during pregnancy on neonatal outcomes, CHERG rules were applied to the outcomes of neonatal mortality, preterm birth, and small for gestational age and low birth weight. One study reported all-cause neonatal mortality which showed significant reduction of 30 % with 37 events in the intervention and 53 events in control group [44]. The overall quality grade for this estimate was that of moderate level which was also downgraded to ‘low’ for translating all-cause into cause specific mortality. This estimate for reduction in all-cause mortality was recommended for inclusion in the LiST as effectiveness of calcium supplementation during pregnancy for neonatal outcomes [12]. Table 3 presents the application of CHERG rules applied to collective neonatal mortality and morbidity outcomes.
Table 2

Application of standardized rules to collective mortality and morbidity outcomes to estimate effect of calcium supplementation during pregnancy on maternal mortality:

Outcome measure

Studies

Total Events

Reduction (Relative risk)

GRADE quality of pooled estimate

Application of standard rules

Cause specific Maternal Mortality

0

-

-

-

-

All cause maternal mortality

(n=1)

7

83%

(RR 0.17; 95% CI 0.02, 1.39)

Low

Rule 1: Do not apply

< 50 events

Eclampsia

(n=1)

42

32% reduction (RR 0.68; 95% CI 0.37, 1.26)

Low

Rule 3: Do not apply

< 50 events

Severe gestational hypertensive related morbidity/mortality*

(n=1)

376

20 %

(RR 0.80; 95 % CI 0.70-0.91)

Moderate

(→ low)

Rule 3 applies

If there is low- or very low-quality evidence of effect on cause-specific mortality,

An d there is high- or moderate-quality evidence of effect on serious morbidity…

Then use the smaller of the two effects.” [47]

Severe

Pre-eclampsia

(n=3)

93

30%

(RR 0.70; 95% CI 0.46, 1.05)

moderate

 

Pre-eclampsia

(n=10)

558

59 %

(RR=0.41; 95% CI 0.24-0.69)

High

 

* Include any one of the following; admission to intensive or special care unit, eclampsia, severe pre-eclampsia, placental abruption, HELLP (hemolysis, elevated liver enzyme and low platelet count) syndrome, renal failure or maternal death.

Table 3

Application of standardized rules for choice of final outcome to estimate effect of calcium supplementation during pregnancy on neonatal mortality

Outcome measure

Studies

Total Events

Reduction (Relative risk)

GRADE quality of pooled estimate

Application of standard rules

All-cause neonatal mortality

1

90

30 %

(RR 0.56-0.88)

Moderate

(→ low)

Rule 1: applies

If there is no evidence of effect on cause-specific mortality,

And there is evidence of effect on all-cause mortality…

Then translate all-cause into cause-specific, and downgrade the quality score by one level”[47]

Preterm Birth

5

967

12%

(RR 0.88; 95% CI 0.78, 0.99)

High

 

Low birth weight

(< 2500 g)

3

1159

19 %

(RR 0.81; 95 % CI 0.58-1.12]

Moderate

 

Small for gestational age

2

84

10 %

(RR 0.90; 95 % CI 0.59-1.38)

Moderate

 

Discussion

Role of calcium supplementation during pregnancy in reducing hypertensive disorders has been evaluated before. The review by Hofmeyr et al [8, 10] included studies from both developed and developing countries and their pooled estimate had shown that calcium supplementation during pregnancy significantly reduced occurrence of gestational hypertension [RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.57-0.86] and pre-eclampsia [RR 0.48, 95% CI 0.33-0.69]. In the same review, risk of prematurity was also reduced in calcium supplemented group compared to control however the results were not statistically significant [RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.64-1.03]. On the other hand, a review by Trumbo and Ellwood for US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has shown that the beneficial effects of calcium supplementation during pregnancy cannot be generalized to USA and populations with adequate baseline calcium intake [11]. This conclusion was based on critical evaluation of studies conducted in similar setting as that of USA; however no meta-analysis was performed.

Our results are confirmatory for the above mentioned reviews. If we pool all the studies from both developed and developing countries, the estimates become RR 0.70 (95 % CI 0.57-0.86) for gestational hypertension, RR 0.47 (95 % CI 0.34-0.66) for pre-eclampsia and RR 0.76 (95 % CI 0.59-0.97) for risk of preterm birth. Estimates for gestational hypertension and pre-eclampsia are similar to that of Hofmyer et al. [10] however the results for risk of preterm birth became statistically significant. This is due to addition of new study from India by Kumar et al which had shown a significant effect in reduction in risk of preterm birth [38]. When we separately pooled the results of studies from developed countries only [3236], the estimate came to be RR 0.77 (95% CI 0.57, 1.03, random model) for gestational hypertension, RR 0.52 (95 % CI 0.27, 1.00, random model) for pre-eclampsia and RR 0.63 (95 % CI 0.33, 1.19, random model) for preterm birth (data not shown).This shows that calcium supplementation did not have any significant effect on risk of gestational hypertensive disorders in developed countries as is shown in the descriptive review of FDA [11].

What could be the explanation of protective effect of calcium supplementation during pregnancy in developing countries and no effect in developed countries? The first and the foremost is the difference in baseline calcium intake. In most of the included studies from developing countries the baseline intake was low (Table 1),while it was adequate in most of the studies from developed countries as reported in review by FDA [11]. Low calcium intake has been hypothesized to cause increase in blood pressure by stimulating the release of parathyroid hormone and/or renin which leads to increased intracellular calcium concentration in vascular smooth muscle cells and causes vasoconstriction [48]. Role of calcium supplementation in reducing hypertensive disorders in pregnancy can possibly be explained by reduction in parathyroid calcium release and intracellular calcium concentration, thereby reducing smooth muscle contractility and promoting vasodilatation [49]. Calcium supplementation could also prevent preterm labor and delivery by reducing uterine smooth muscle contractility [36] directly and indirectly by increasing magnesium levels [22]. The second explanation could be prevalent malnutrition in developing countries. It had been proposed that hormones involved in blood pressure control are altered during malnutrition and can lead to significant morbidity in malnourished pregnant women [47, 50].

Our review has shown that calcium supplementation during pregnancy reduces all gestational hypertensive related disorders. The reduction in pre-eclampsia was more than 50% in the present review. There was a great deal of heterogeneity in the pooled estimate which can primarily be explained by difference in the effect size, with significant results more strongly present in smaller trials (Figure 3). The two major contributors to heterogeneity were studies by Villar et al. 2006 [44], the largest of included studies and study by Wanchu et al. 2001 [45] the second smallest study in the pooled data. Another explanation for this heterogeneity was the increased effect of intervention in trials with high risk women included, and on sub-group analysis the most marked reduction in pre-eclampsia was in the above group, and no heterogeneity was reported in the results (Figure 3). The funnel plot for risk of pre-eclampsia was not very symmetric (Figure 7). Studies with low SE contributed the most to the pooled effect size however two studies with high SE had the highest protective effect. Publication bias may be one of the reasons of this asymmetry of the funnel plot however this may also be due to smaller sample size of some of the included studies.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2458-11-S3-S18/MediaObjects/12889_2011_Article_2954_Fig7_HTML.jpg
Figure 7

Funnel plot of studies evaluating effect of calcium supplementation during pregnancy in reducing risk of pre-eclampsia in developing countries.

Maternal mortality is a relatively rare event [2]. It is very difficult to design studies powered enough to detect a significant effect of an intervention on maternal mortality. According to CHERG rules, we had recommended reduction in severe maternal morbidity/mortality as a proxy for effectiveness of calcium supplementation during pregnancy in reducing maternal mortality related to gestational hypertensive disorders, for inclusion in the LiST model. This composite outcome included gestational hypertensive related severe maternal morbidities that can lead to maternal death [44]. This approach of reporting potentially fatal gestational hypertensive related maternal morbidities have also been adopted in antioxidant trials for prevention of pre-eclampsia [51]. The overall grade evidence for this outcome was that of ‘moderate’ level which was downgraded to ‘low’ for its recommendation as a proxy for maternal mortality. We also applied CHERG rules to neonatal outcomes. Considering mortality and morbidity outcomes, effect size for all-cause neonatal mortality was chosen for inclusion in the LiST based on its statistical significance and quality grade. The overall quality grade was that of ‘moderate’ level which was downgraded to ‘low’ for translating all-cause onto cause specific mortality[47]. The beneficial effect of calcium supplementation in reducing neonatal mortality seems to be related to reduction in preterm birth and birth asphyxia. There was a significant reduction of 12 % (95 % CI 1% to 22%) in preterm birth in calcium supplemented group compared to control (Figure 5). This pathway can be related to severe gestational hypertensive morbidities (e.g. eclampsia) which can lead to preterm birth and birth asphyxia and calcium supplementation has shown reduction in all severe morbidities (Additional File 1). It is important to note that maternal calcium supplementation during pregnancy is not only effective in reducing neonatal mortality but also morbidities later in childhood. A review by Bergel and Barros had reported that offspring of women who were supplemented with calcium during pregnancy had low incidence of hypertension in childhood [52].

Our review has certain limitations. In two of the included studies [45, 46], the comparison group did not receive the placebo but the participants were simply observed as controls. This could have biased the results in favor of intervention[16]. We did not look at the side effects related to calcium supplementation during pregnancy. The previous reviews, however, have shown that it is not associated with any particular harmful effects [10].

Findings of this review and those of previous reviews gave conclusive evidence on effectiveness of calcium supplementation during pregnancy in reducing maternal gestational hypertensive related disorders in populations with low baseline calcium intake [8, 11]. Future research should focus on delivery platforms, regimens and programmatic aspect of the intervention. It would be relevant to assess the bioavailability of calcium when delivered for example via dietary modification or food fortification. It is important for example to determine effectiveness of calcium supplementation by dietary modification at places where baseline calcium intake is from dairy products compared with those where it is mostly taken in from vegetarian sources. It is also important to calculate an internationally accepted value to define adequacy given the large variations in calcium recommendations in different countries of the world.

Implementation of recommendation of calcium supplementation to all pregnant women in developing countries poses a major challenge to policy-makers and program managers of these countries. It is important to take steps for procurement of the preparation, storage, distribution, quality-control, and compliance assurance with daily supplements to large numbers of pregnant women. It is also important to consider cultural, financial, and educational barriers to changing policy and lessons should be learnt from practices of previous programs like iron+folic acid supplementation schemes in these countries. Lack of infrastructure and poor compliance were considered as few of the major barriers in implementation of these programs in these countries [53]. Issues of cost effectiveness should also be considered and weighed for increasing the calcium intake by dietary modification or food fortification. Increasing dietary calcium intake may seem to be an easier intervention than calcium supplementation, although availability of dairy products in many countries may not be sufficient to fulfill the need. Alternatively, targeted food fortification with calcium may be a feasible intervention, especially for high-risk women, who may not be targeted for individual calcium supplementation because they do not come for antenatal care services [54].

Conclusion

Calcium supplementation during pregnancy leads to a reduction of 59 % (95 % CI 31 % to 76 %) in risk of pre-eclampsia, 45 % (95 % CI 15 % to 64 %) in risk of development of gestational hypertension and 12 % (95 % CI 1% to 22 %) in risk of preterm birth in developing countries. Calcium should be supplemented to all women during pregnancy in developing countries.

Declarations

Acknowledgment

This work was supported in part by a grant to the US Fund for UNICEF from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (grant 43386) to “Promote evidence-based decision making in designing maternal, neonatal and child health interventions in low- and middle-income countries”. We thank Dr Mohammad Yawar Yakoob for critically reviewing the manuscript.

This article has been published as part of BMC Public Health Volume 11 Supplement 3, 2011: Technical inputs, enhancements and applications of the Lives Saved Tool (LiST). The full contents of the supplement are available online at http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/11?issue=S3.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Division of Women & Child Health, The Aga Khan University

References

  1. Duley L: The global impact of pre-eclampsia and eclampsia. Semin Perinatol. 2009, 33 (3): 130-137. 10.1053/j.semperi.2009.02.010.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Khan KS, Wojdyla D, Say L, Gulmezoglu AM, Van Look PF: WHO analysis of causes of maternal death: a systematic review. Lancet. 2006, 367 (9516): 1066-1074. 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68397-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Villar J, Say L, Shennan A, Lindheimer M, Duley L, Conde-Agudelo A: Methodological and technical issues related to the diagnosis, screening, prevention and treatment of pre-eclampsia and eclampsia. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics. 2004, 85 (Suppl 1): S28-S41.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Villar J, Belizan J, Fisher P: Epidemiological observation on the realtionship between calcium intake and eclampsia. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1983, 21: 271-10.1016/0020-7292(83)90016-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Habli M, Levine RJ, Qian C, Sibai B: Neonatal outcomes in pregnancies with preeclampsia or gestational hypertension and in normotensive pregnancies that delivered at 35, 36, or 37 weeks of gestation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007, 197 (4): 406 e401-407. 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.06.059.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Ananth CV, Basso O: Impact of pregnancy-induced hypertension on stillbirth and neonatal mortality. Epidemiology. 2010, 21 (1): 118-123. 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181c297af.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Ortega RM, Martinez RM, Lopez-Sobaler AM, Andres P, Quintas ME: Influence of calcium intake on gestational hypertension. Ann Nutr Metab. 1999, 43 (1): 37-46. 10.1159/000012765.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Hofmeyr GJ, Duley L, Atallah A: Dietary calcium supplementation for prevention of pre-eclampsia and related problems: a systematic review and commentary. Bjog. 2007, 114 (8): 933-943. 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01389.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Bucher HC, Cook RJ, Guyatt GH, Lang JD, Cook DJ, Hatala R, Hunt DL: Effects of dietary calcium supplementation on blood pressure. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Jama. 1996, 275 (13): 1016-1022. 10.1001/jama.275.13.1016.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Hofmeyr GJ, Atallah AN, Duley L: Calcium supplementation during pregnancy for preventing hypertensive disorders and related problems. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006, 3: CD001059-PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Trumbo PR, Ellwood KC: Supplemental calcium and risk reduction of hypertension, pregnancy-induced hypertension, and preeclampsia: an evidence-based review by the US Food and Drug Administration. Nutr Rev. 2007, 65 (2): 78-87. 10.1111/j.1753-4887.2007.tb00284.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Walker N, Fischer-Walker C, Bryce J, Bahl R, Cousens S: Standards for CHERG reviews of intervention effects on child survival. Int J Epidemiol. 39 (Suppl 1): i21-31.
  13. Atkins D, Eccles M, Flottorp S, Guyatt GH, Henry D, Hill S, Liberati A, O'Connell D, Oxman AD, Phillips B, et al: Systems for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations I: critical appraisal of existing approaches The GRADE Working Group. BMC Health Serv Res. 2004, 4 (1): 38-10.1186/1472-6963-4-38.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Worlbank: WorldBank. Data - Country Classification. 2008. 2008, [http://web.worldbank.org/]Google Scholar
  15. ACOG practice bulletin. Diagnosis and management of preeclampsia and eclampsia. Number 33, January 2002. Obstet Gynecol. 2002, 99 (1): 159-167. 10.1016/S0029-7844(01)01747-1.
  16. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Edited by: Higgins JPT, Green S. 2008, Version 5.0.2 [updated September 2009], [http://www.cochrane-handbook.org]
  17. RevMan: The Cochrane Colloboration. Review Manager (RevMan) 5 for Windows. 2003, Oxford EnglandGoogle Scholar
  18. Almirante CY: Calcium supplementation during pregnancy in the prevention of EPH gestosis. Prenatal and Neonatal Medicine. 1998, 3 (suppl): 1-24.Google Scholar
  19. Felix C, Jacome P, Lopez A, Moya W, Narvaez M, Lopez-Jaramillo P: The hypotensive effect of calcium supplementation during normal pregnancy in Andean women is not related to vascular production of prostacyclin by umbilical arteries. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 1991, 11 (2): 93-96. 10.3109/01443619109013523.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Knight KB, Keith RE: Calcium supplementation on normotensive and hypertensive pregnant women. Am J Clin Nutr. 1992, 55 (4): 891-895.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Marya RK, Rathee S, Manrow M: Effect of calcium and vitamin D supplementation on toxaemia of pregnancy. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 1987, 24 (1): 38-42. 10.1159/000298772.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Repke J, Villar J, Bergel E, Belizan JM: The effect of iron absorption in patients receiving calcium supplementation. 9th Annual Meeting of the Society of Perinatal Obstetricians. 1989, New Orleans, Louisiana, USAGoogle Scholar
  23. Montanaro D, Boscutti G, Antonucci F, Messa P, Mioni G, Driul P: Prevention of pregnancy-induced hypertension (PIH) and preeclampsia (PE) by oral calcium supplementation. Proceedings of the 10th International Congress of Nephrology. 1987, London UK, 281-Google Scholar
  24. Raman L, Rajalakshmi K, Krishnamachari KA, Sastry JG: Effect of calcium supplementation to undernourished mothers during pregnancy on the bone density of the bone density of the neonates. Am J Clin Nutr. 1978, 31 (3): 466-469.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Boggess KA, Samuel L, Schmucker BC, Waters J, Easterling TR: A randomized controlled trial of the effect of third-trimester calcium supplementation on maternal hemodynamic function. Obstet Gynecol. 1997, 90 (2): 157-161. 10.1016/S0029-7844(97)00248-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Cong K, Chi S, Liu G: Calcium supplementation during pregnancy for reducing pregnancy induced hypertension. Chin Med J (Engl). 1995, 108 (1): 57-59.Google Scholar
  27. Rogers MS, Fung HY, Hung CY: Calcium and low-dose aspirin prophylaxis in women at high risk of pregnancy-induced hypertension. Hypertens Pregnancy. 1999, 18 (2): 165-172. 10.3109/10641959909023076.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Sanchez-Ramos L, Adair CD, Kaunitz AM, Briones DK, Del Valle GO, Delke I: Calcium supplementation in mild preeclampsia remote from term: a randomized double-blind clinical trial. Obstet Gynecol. 1995, 85 (6): 915-918. 10.1016/0029-7844(95)00052-S.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Tamas P, Szabo I, Szekely J, Csermely T, Prievara FT, Nemeth L: Effects of Doxium 500 (R) in gestational hypertension [A doxium 500 (R) Hatasanak vizsgalata terhessegi Hypertoniaban (kettos vak, placebo–kontrollalt tanulmany)]. Magyar Noorvosok Lapja. 1997, 60 (3): 181-187.Google Scholar
  30. Herrera JA, Arevalo-Herrera M, Herrera S: Prevention of preeclampsia by linoleic acid and calcium supplementation: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 1998, 91 (4): 585-590. 10.1016/S0029-7844(97)00711-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Kawasaki N, Matsui K, Ito M, Nakamura T, Yoshimura T, Ushijima H, Maeyama M: Effect of calcium supplementation on the vascular sensitivity to angiotensin II in pregnant women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1985, 153 (5): 576-582.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Crowther CA, Hiller JE, Pridmore B, Bryce R, Duggan P, Hague WM, Robinson JS: Calcium supplementation in nulliparous women for the prevention of pregnancy-induced hypertension, preeclampsia and preterm birth: an Australian randomized trial. FRACOG and the ACT Study Group. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1999, 39 (1): 12-18. 10.1111/j.1479-828X.1999.tb03434.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Levine RJ, Hauth JC, Curet LB, Sibai BM, Catalano PM, Morris CD, DerSimonian R, Esterlitz JR, Raymond EG, Bild DE, et al: Trial of calcium to prevent preeclampsia. N Engl J Med. 1997, 337 (2): 69-76. 10.1056/NEJM199707103370201.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Sanchez-Ramos L, Briones DK, Kaunitz AM, Delvalle GO, Gaudier FL, Walker CD: Prevention of pregnancy-induced hypertension by calcium supplementation in angiotensin II-sensitive patients. Obstet Gynecol. 1994, 84 (3): 349-353.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Villar J, Repke J, Belizan JM, Pareja G: Calcium supplementation reduces blood pressure during pregnancy: results of a randomized controlled clinical trial. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 1987, 70: 317-322.Google Scholar
  36. Villar J, Repke JT: Calcium supplementation during pregnancy may reduce preterm delivery in high-risk populations. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1990, 163 (4 Pt 1): 1124-1131.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Belizan JM, Villar J, Gonzalez L, Campodonico L, Bergel E: Calcium supplementation to prevent hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. N Engl J Med. 1991, 325 (20): 1399-1405. 10.1056/NEJM199111143252002.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Kumar A, Devi SG, Batra S, Singh C, Shukla DK: Calcium supplementation for the prevention of pre-eclampsia. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2009, 104 (1): 32-36. 10.1016/j.ijgo.2008.08.027.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Lopez-Jaramillo P, Delgado F, Jacome P, Teran E, Ruano C, Rivera J: Calcium supplementation and the risk of preeclampsia in Ecuadorian pregnant teenagers. Obstet Gynecol. 1997, 90 (2): 162-167. 10.1016/S0029-7844(97)00254-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Lopez-Jaramillo P, Narvaez M, Felix C, Lopez A: Dietary calcium supplementation and prevention of pregnancy hypertension. Lancet. 1990, 335 (8684): 293-10.1016/0140-6736(90)90112-I.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Lopez-Jaramillo P, Narvaez M, Weigel RM, Yepez R: Calcium supplementation reduces the risk of pregnancy-induced hypertension in an Andes population. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1989, 96 (6): 648-655. 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1989.tb03278.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Niromanesh S, Laghaii S, Mosavi-Jarrahi A: Supplementary calcium in prevention of pre-eclampsia. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2001, 74 (1): 17-21. 10.1016/S0020-7292(01)00374-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Purwar M, Kulkarni H, Motghare V, Dhole S: Calcium supplementation and prevention of pregnancy induced hypertension. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 1996, 22 (5): 425-430.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Villar J, Abdel-Aleem H, Merialdi M, Mathai M, Ali MM, Zavaleta N, Purwar M, Hofmeyr J, Nguyen TN, Campodonico L, et al: World Health Organization randomized trial of calcium supplementation among low calcium intake pregnant women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006, 194 (3): 639-649. 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.01.068.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Wanchu M, Malhotra S, Khullar M: Calcium supplementation in pre-eclampsia. J Assoc Physicians India. 2001, 49: 795-798.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Taherian AA, Taherian A, Shirvani A: Prevention of pre-eclampsia with low-dose aspirin or calcium supplementation. Archives of Iranian Medicine. 2002, 5 (3): 151-156.Google Scholar
  47. Thrift AG, Srikanth V, Fitzgerald SM, Kalyanram K, Kartik K, Hoppe CC, Walker KZ, Evans RG: Potential roles of high salt intake and maternal malnutrition in the development of hypertension in disadvantaged populations. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 2010, 37 (2): e78-90. 10.1111/j.1440-1681.2009.05266.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Belizan JM, Villar J, Repke J: The relationship between calcium intake and pregnancy-induced hypertension: up-to-date evidence. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1988, 158 (4): 898-902.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Villar J, Repke J, Belizan J: Relationship of blood pressure, calcium intake, and parathyroid hormone. Am J Clin Nutr. 1989, 49 (1): 183-184.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Torun B: Protein energy malnutrition. Modern Nutrition in health and disease. Edited by: Shils ME, Shike M, Ross AC, Caballero B, Cousin RJ. 2006, Baltimore: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, 9Google Scholar
  51. Rumbold A, Duley L, Crowther CA, Haslam RR: Antioxidants for preventing pre-eclampsia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008, CD004227-1
  52. Bergel E, Barros AJ: Effect of maternal calcium intake during pregnancy on children's blood pressure: a systematic review of the literature. BMC Pediatr. 2007, 7: 15-10.1186/1471-2431-7-15.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Mora JO: Iron supplementation: overcoming technical and practical barriers. J Nutr. 2002, 132 (4 Suppl): 853S-855S.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Palacios C, Pena-Rosas JP: Calcium supplementation during pregnancy for preventing hypertensive disorders and related problems: RHL commentary (last revised: 1 February 2010). 2010, Geneva: The WHO Reproductive Health Library: World Health OrganizationGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Imdad et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement