Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of the Studies Reviewed in the Meta-synthesis

From: How does the general public view posthumous organ donation? A meta-synthesis of the qualitative literature

Study

Reference

Country

Participants

Recruitment

Data collection

1

Albright et al., 2005 [13]

USA

57 Filipino adolescents & adults

Purposive sampling

Focus groups

2

AlKhawari et al., 2005 [14]

UK

141 Indo-Asian adults

Convenience sampling through Islamic centers

Semi-structured interviews & focus groups

3

Arriola et al., 2005 [15];

Arriola et al., 2007 [16]

USA

68 African-American adults

Convenience sampling through Churches

Focus groups

4

Bhengu & Uys, 2004 [17]

South Africa

1 non-Zulu speaking & 47 Zulu speaking adults

Purposive & snowball sampling

Semi-structured interviews

5

Braun & Nichols, 1997 [18]

USA

7 Chinese American adults, 8 Japanese American adults, 10 Vietnamese American adults, & 11 Filipino American adults

Purposive & snowball sampling

Semi-structured interviews & focus groups

6

Davis & Randhawa, 2004 [19]; Davis & Randhawa, 2006 [20]

UK

120 African & Caribbean adults

Purposive sampling

Focus groups

7

Exley et al., 1996 [21]

UK

22 Sikh adults

Purposive sampling

Semi-structured interviews & focus groups

8

Fahrenwald & Stabnow, 2005 [22]

USA

21 Oglala Lakota Sioux adults

Snowball sampling

Semi-structured interviews

9

Frates & Garcia Bohrer, 2002 [23]

USA

22 Hispanic adults

Telephone and purposive sampling

Semi-structured interviews

10

Hayward & Madill, 2003 [24]

UK

10 Pakistani & 17 white English adults

Convenience & snowball sampling

Focus groups

11

Kennedy, 2002 [25]

India

6 English-speaking adults†

Convenience sampling

Discursive interviews

12

Lai et al., 2007 [26]

UK

14 adult women from the general population

Snowball sampling

Active interviews

13

Moloney & Walker, 2002 [27]

Australia

29 adults from the general population

Randomly selected from electoral rolls

Focus groups

14

Molzahn et al., 2004 [28]

Canada

14 Coast Salish adults

Purposive & snowball sampling

Semi-structured interviews

15

Molzahn et al., 2005 [29]

Canada

39 Chinese adults

Purposive & snowball sampling

Focus groups & semi-structured interviews

16

Molzahn et al., 2005 [30]

Canada

40 South Asian adults

Purposive & snowball sampling

Focus groups & semi-structured interviews

17

Morgan, Mayblin et al., 2008 [31]

UK

14 Caribbean adults

Convenience & snow-ball sampling

Semi-structured interviews

18

Morgan, Harrison et al., 2008 [32]; Morgan et al., 2005 [33]

USA

78 family-pair dyads (156 adults) from the general population

Advertisements

Observation of communication between dyads

19

Peters et al., 1996 [34]

USA

51 registered donors & 51 non-registered donors from the general population

Not specified

Focus groups

20

Randhawa, 1998 [35]

UK

16 Sikh, 32 Muslim & 16 Hindu adults, all originally from South Asia

Randomly selected from electoral rolls

Focus groups

21

Sanner, 1994 [36]

Sweden

38 adults from the general population

Purposive sampling

Semi-structured interviews

22

Sanner, 2001 [37]

Sweden

69 adults from the general population

Purposive sampling

Semi-structured interviews

23

Thompson, 1993 [38]

USA

30 African-American adolescents & 26 African-American adults

Convenience sampling

Focus groups

24

Wittig, 2001 [39]

USA

10 African-American women

Purposive sampling

Semi-structured interviews

  1. † Comments from two doctors, which were analyzed separately in this article, were not examined.