Variability in school closure decisions in response to 2009 H1N1: a qualitative systems improvement analysis
© Klaiman et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
Received: 27 August 2010
Accepted: 1 February 2011
Published: 1 February 2011
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|27 Aug 2010||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|13 Oct 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Simon Cauchemez|
|1 Dec 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Philip Cooley|
|22 Dec 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Michael Stoto|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|22 Dec 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|29 Dec 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Philip Cooley|
|13 Jan 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Simon Cauchemez|
|18 Jan 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Michael Stoto|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|18 Jan 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|26 Jan 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Michael Stoto|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|26 Jan 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|Resubmission - Version 6|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 6|
|28 Jan 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Michael Stoto|
|Resubmission - Version 7|
|28 Jan 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 7|
|1 Feb 2011||Editorially accepted|
|1 Feb 2011||Article published||10.1186/1471-2458-11-73|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.