Skip to main content

Table 1 Results of methodological assessment of studies included in the review

From: Awareness and knowledge of sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) among school-going adolescents in Europe: a systematic review of published literature

 

Number of studies in each assessment category*

Criteria

Y

S

N

NC

NR

PR

NA

NP

P

Did the study address a clearly focused issue?

15

        

Was/were the study outcome(s) to be measured clearly described?

15

        

Were the questions posed to assess outcome(s) clearly defined?

14

 

1

      

Was the study samle clearly defined?

13

       

2

Were participating schools recruited in an acceptable way?

4

1

 

1

  

1

8

 

Were the pupils recruited in an acceptable way? 1

11

  

4

     

Were characteristics of subjects at enrolment reported?

12

 

1

     

2

Is it clear how data were collected?

15

        

Did the authors mention that the instrument used for data collection was pre-tested or validated?

8

 

6

     

1

Were the questions posed appropriate to address given outcomes?

10

  

1

   

4

 

Was participation rate reported?

9

  

2

4

    

Was participation rate sufficiently high?

7

1

1

    

6

 

Was the data analysis sufficiently rigorous?

15

        

Were other factors accounted for that could affect outcomes?2

15

        

Were results appropriately reported? 3

11

1

      

3

Is there a clear statement of findings?

15

        
  1. *Y = Yes, S = Substandard, N = No, NC = Not Clear, NR = Not Reported, PR = Partially Reported, NA = Not Applicable, NP = Not Possible to Assess, P = Partly
  2. 1 did all pupils at the school(s), respectively in the grade concerned, have the same chance to participate?
  3. 2 for example, sex, age, grade, school type, social class
  4. 3 were numbers of outcome events reported on?