Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
4 Nov 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
27 Dec 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Sue Perez |
28 Dec 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Herman Willems |
14 Jan 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jeroen van Gorkom |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
11 Mar 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Herman Willems |
22 Mar 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Sue Perez |
15 Apr 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jeroen van Gorkom |
6 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - John Ayisi |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
6 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
10 May 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Sue Perez |
24 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - John Ayisi |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
24 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
18 Jun 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - John Ayisi |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
18 Jun 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 7 | |
26 Jun 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - John Ayisi |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
26 Jun 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
Publishing | ||
29 Jun 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
29 Jun 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2458-11-515 |
You can find further information about peer review here.