Characteristics of patients with venous thromboembolism and atrial fibrillation in Venezuela

  • Dimitri Bennett1Email author,

    Affiliated with

    • Jorge Abate2 and

      Affiliated with

      • Page E Abrahamson1

        Affiliated with

        BMC Public Health201111:415

        DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-415

        Received: 18 May 2010

        Accepted: 31 May 2011

        Published: 31 May 2011

        Abstract

        Background

        Studies describing venous thromboembolic event (VTEE) and atrial fibrillation (AF) in South American populations are limited. The aim of this cross-sectional study was to describe the characteristics of Venezuelan patients admitted and treated for these conditions.

        Methods

        A retrospective medical record review of 1397 consecutive patients admitted to three private hospitals or clinics between January 2000 and December 2005 was performed. Data was collected on demographics, anthropometrics, hospital visit, comorbidities and treatment.

        Results

        Among 401 VTEE and 996 AF patients, men were more likely to have AF (58%) while more women experienced a VTEE (58%). Most patients were admitted via the emergency room (87%) and had only one event during the study period (83%). Common comorbidities included hypertension (46%), heart failure (17%), diabetes (12%) and congestive heart failure (11%). Characteristics of Venezuelan patients with VTEE and AF are similar to that reported in the literature for other populations.

        Conclusions

        These results provide background characteristics for future studies assessing risk factors for AF and VTEE in South American populations.

        Background

        The size of the elderly population is growing rapidly worldwide, including developed and developing countries [1]. Older age is a risk factor for developing many diseases, including venous thromboembolic events (VTEE) and atrial fibrillation (AF). Thus, the disease burden associated with VTEE and AF is expected to expand as elderly populations continue to rise.

        The impact of VTEE and AF on mortality and morbidity is substantial, as are the socioeconomic consequences in terms of hospital admissions and management of chronic diseases and disabilities. AF is the most common cardiac rhythm disorder, affecting approximately 2.3 million people in the United States (US) and 4.8 million in the 6 major pharmaceutical markets (France, Spain, Germany, United Kingdom, Italy, Japan,) combined [2]. VTEEs are common vascular diseases with an average annual incidence rate among in the US and Europe of 100 to 200 per 100,000 person-years in the US and Europe; roughly 900,000 incident or recurrent cases occurring annually in the US alone [36]. The incidence rate appears to be similar or higher among African-Americans and lower for Asian- and Native-American populations in the US [7, 8].

        Although the epidemiology of VTEE and AF is very well described in North America and Europe, there is a paucity of published epidemiological data on the descriptive epidemiology of patients with these conditions in South American populations. Therefore, we conducted a descriptive study of patients diagnosed with VTEE and AF to better understand the disease burden in Venezuela.

        Methods

        Using a retrospective cross-sectional study design, we reviewed medical records for two groups of adult (18+ years) patients (VTEE or AF) diagnosed between January 2000 and December 2005 at three private Venezuelan hospitals or clinics located in Caracas: Clínica Santa Sofía, Policlínica Metropolitana, and Hospital de Clínicas Caracas. Hospital de Clinicas Caracas, the most technologically advanced private health care institution in Venezuela with 13,500 admissions, 7,000 annual surgeries and 180 beds for inpatient population. The hospital provides primary, tertiary, and transplant services and employs 400 physicians and 373 nurses who provide excellent medical care services. Policlinica Metropolitana and Clinica Santa Sofia are another 2 private clinics that provide excellent medical services. Both clinics provide primary, tertiary and transplant services as well. All hospitals and clinics included in the study maintain a central repository of electronic medical records for all patients admitted through the emergency rooms. The diagnosis of VTEE or AF was defined using the International Classification of Disease 10th Revision (ICD- 10) and confirmed by the treating physician [9]. This research received a waiver of consent from the Independent Ethics Committee ("Comisión de Bioética y Bioseguridad del Fondo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología") in Venezuela for use of patient medical record data.

        Data was abstracted from medical records using a structured case report form to gather information regarding age, gender, weight, source at index hospitalization, admission diagnosis, use of anticoagulation therapy, length of hospital stay and disposition, comorbidities (defined by ICD-10 codes) and medications (Venezuela's Vademecum). Vademecum is a medication handbook which contains information on trademarks, active principles, interactions, adverse reactions, international equivalences, and manufacturers. Descriptive statistics were calculated using SPSS V. 12 software.

        Results

        The study population included 401 patients with VTEEs and 996 AF patients (Table 1). The most common VTEEs were phlebitis or thrombophlebitis (67%), pulmonary embolism (17%), other venous embolism or thrombosis (9%), venous embolism combined with phlebitis (6%). The mean age at diagnosis was 60.1 and 70.7 years old for VTEE and AF patients, respectively. More VTEEs occurred among women (58%), whereas AF was more common in men (58%). Most patients presented at the emergency room (VTEE: 89%, AF: 87%) with mean hospitalization duration of approximately 5 days for both patient groups. The majority of patients experienced a single VTEE (88%) or AF (80%) event during the study period from 2000 to 2005. Most patients returned home following hospitalization; 5 VTEE and 4 AF patients readmitted to the hospital (data not shown). Comorbidities were generally more common among AF patients compared to patients diagnosed with a VTEE. Hypertension was the most common comorbidity observed in both VTEE (26%) and AF (54%) patients, followed by heart failure (VTEE: 3%, AF: 23%), diabetes (VTEE: 12%, AF: 12%) and congestive heart failure (VTEE: 3%, AF: 14%). Cancer more common among VTEE patients (8%) compared with AF patients (4%). In a subset of patients with anthropometric data available, mean height and weight were similar in both disease groups (data not shown).
        Table 1

        Characteristics of patients diagnosed with a venous thromboembolic event (VTEE) or atrial fibrillation (AF), Venezuela, 2000-2005

        Characteristic

        VTEE (n = 401)

        AF (n = 996)

        Age (years), mean (range)

        60.1 (22-103)

        70.7 (18-101)

        Sex, N (%)

          

           Male

        168 (42%)

        577 (58%)

           Female

        230 (58%)

        410 (42%)

        No. VTEE/AF Events, 2000- 2005, N (%)

          

           1

        354 (88%)

        798 (80%)

           2

        37 (9%)

        146 (15%)

           3

        8 (2%)

        35 (3%)

           4+

        2 (<1%)

        17 (2%)

        Hospital Admission Source, N (%)

          

           Emergency room

        356 (89%)

        865 (87%)

           Routine admission/outpatient

        27 (7%)

        76 (8%)

           Transfer

        16 (4%)

        51 (5%)

           Unknown

        2 (<1%)

        4 (<1%)

        Days of Hospital Stay, mean (range)

        5.4 (1-75)

        4.5 (1-49)

        Comorbidities, N (%)

          

           Hypertension

        105 (26%)

        540 (54%)

           Heart failure

        13 (3%)

        225 (23%)

           Diabetes

        46 (12%)

        122 (12%)

           Congestive heart failure

        12 (3%)

        134 (14%)

           Cancer

        33 (8%)

        35 (4%)

           Coronary artery disease

        4 (1%)

        47 (5%)

           Prior myocardial infarction

        2 (<1%)

        45 (5%)

           Prior transient ischemic attack

        2 (<1%)

        37 (4%)

           Prior stroke

        4 (1%)

        29 (3%)

           Prior bleeding event

        0

        2 (<1%)

        Table 2 describes the primary hospital admission and discharge codes for the VTEE and AF patients. Deep vein thromboembolism was the most common hospital admission (41%) and discharge (53%) diagnosis for VTEE patients. Among AF patients, AF was listed as the admission diagnosis for only 44% of population; however, AF was recorded as the primary diagnosis for 86% of patients at the time of hospital discharge.
        Table 2

        Common hospital admission and discharge diagnoses for patients with venous thromboembolic event (VTEE) and atrial fibrillation (AF) in Venezuela

         

        VTEE (n = 401)

        AF (n = 996)

         

        n

        %

        n

        %

        Admission diagnosis

            

           Atrial fibrillation

        0

        0.0%

        439

        44.1%

           Deep venous thromboembolism

        165

        41.1%

        0

        0.0%

           Cerebrovascular accident

        6

        1.5%

        86

        8.6%

           Cardiac insufficiency

        8

        2.0%

        60

        6.0%

           Pulmonary embolism

        45

        11.2%

        0

        0.0%

           Thrombophlebitis

        34

        8.5%

        0

        0.0%

           Ischemic cardiopathy

        3

        0.7%

        27

        2.7%

           Pneumonia

        6

        1.5%

        21

        2.1%

           Unstable angina

        0

        0.0%

        27

        2.7%

           Respiratory infection

        4

        1.0%

        23

        2.3%

           Hypertension

        5

        1.2%

        22

        2.2%

           Respiratory insufficiency

        12

        3.0%

        14

        1.4%

           Cellulitis

        25

        6.2%

        0

        0.0%

           Embolism/thromb. of arteries lower extrem.

        21

        5.2%

        0

        0.0%

           Arrhythmia

        0

        0.0%

        14

        1.4%

           Syncope

        0

        0.0%

        14

        1.4%

           Pulmonary oedema

        0

        0.0%

        12

        1.2%

           Acute coronary syndrome

        1

        0.2%

        11

        1.1%

           Other

        66

        16.5%

        226

        22.7%

        Discharge diagnosis

            

           Atrial fibrillation

        0

        0.0%

        857

        86.0%

           Deep venous thromboembolism

        212

        52.9%

        3

        0.3%

           Pulmonary embolism

        64

        16.0%

        7

        0.7%

           Thrombophlebitis

        47

        11.7%

        0

        0.0%

           Cardiac insufficiency

        6

        1.5%

        38

        3.8%

           Cerebrovascular accident

        4

        1.0%

        24

        2.4%

           Venous embolism and thrombosis

        23

        5.7%

        1

        0.1%

           Ischemic cardiopathy

        5

        1.2%

        14

        1.4%

           Auricular flutter

        0

        0.0%

        14

        1.4%

           Other

        40

        10.0%

        39

        3.9%

        As presented in Table 3, enoxaparin and warfarin were the mostly commonly prescribed anticoagulant medications for both VTEE and AF, although a larger proportion of VTEE patients (66% and 68%, respectively) were prescribed these medications compared to AF patients (48% and 32%). Heparin was used more frequently among VTEE patients (40%) compared to those with AF (3%); roughly 3% of both patient groups were treated with dalteparin. The most common concomitant medications among the VTEE patients were proton-pump inhibitors (38%), H2 blockers (33%), and benzodiazepines (30%). A similar proportion of AF patients were treated with these same medications, but the majority was also treated with antiarrhythmic drugs (83%). Twenty (2%) of AF patients and 3 (<1%) of VTEE patients died during the study period (data not shown).
        Table 3

        Common medications prescribed for patients with a venous thromboembolic event (VTEE) or atrial fibrillation (AF)

         

        VTEE (n = 401)

        AF (n = 996)

         

        n

        %

        n

        %

        Anticoagulant used

            

           Dalteparin sodium

        12

        3.0%

        24

        2.4%

           Enoxaparin

        264

        65.8%

        476

        47.8%

           Heparin sodium

        159

        39.7%

        32

        3.2%

           Warfarin sodium

        271

        67.6%

        323

        32.4%

        Class of Concomitant Medications

            

           Antiarrhythmic drugs

        38

        9.5%

        831

        83.4%

           Proton-pump inhibitors

        151

        37.7%

        293

        29.4%

           Benzodiazepines

        119

        29.7%

        312

        31.3%

           H2 blockers

        131

        32.7%

        239

        24.0%

           Diuretics

        22

        5.5%

        248

        24.9%

           Antiplatelet drugs

        51

        12.7%

        188

        18.9%

           Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor

        27

        6.7%

        208

        20.9%

           Beta blockers

        25

        6.2%

        156

        15.7%

           Aldosterone receptor antagonists

        15

        3.7%

        141

        14.2%

           Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory medications

        66

        16.5%

        73

        7.3%

           Salicylates

        17

        4.2%

        85

        8.5%

           Quinolone antibiotics

        31

        7.7%

        54

        5.4%

           Calcium antagonist

        9

        2.2%

        71

        7.1%

           Cephalosporins

        44

        11.0%

        26

        2.6%

        Discussion

        This is one of the first studies describing the epidemiology of VTEE and AF in Venezuela. The frequency of some common and rare comorbid conditions in the Venezuelan patient population is similar to what has been observed in North American and European populations. For example, approximately one quarter of VTEE and half of all AF patients in the Venezuelan population were hypertensive; similar rates have been reported in the literature [1014]. Rare events such as prior myocardial infarction, transient ischemic attack or stroke each occurred in roughly 0-5% of AF patients in the present study as well as other large cohorts [11, 12, 14]. The prevalence of heart failure and diabetes found in Venezuelan VTEE and AF populations also is similar to what has been reported in other published studies [1015]. This new research suggests that Venezuelan patients with VTEE and AF share similar epidemiologic characteristics and risk factors for developing these conditions as populations in other parts of the world.

        We found that the Venezuelan VTEE population was less likely to have cancer as a comorbidity (8%) compared to VTEE patients in the US and Europe which ranges from 20-32% [10, 15, 16]. It is estimated that cancer accounts for approximately 20% of incident VTEE in the US and the risk is highest for patients diagnosed with certain types of cancer or receiving particular therapies such as immunosuppressive or cytotoxic chemotherapy [3]. It is possible that the lower cancer prevalence in Venezuelans with VTEE is explained by reduced access to expensive or experimental cancer treatments or differences in incidence rates of cancers such as digestive malignancies that are more closely associated with VTEE [3, 17].

        There are several strengths to this cross-sectional study. First, the retrospective study included the use of ICD-10 diagnosis codes and Vademecum medication codes which provide consistent patient data. The use of ICD codes has been shown to reliably capture cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events [18, 19]. For example, defining patient-level covariates by the ICD-10 diagnoses are quite good and coded with high sensitivity for coronary artery disease/ischemic heart disease (98%), diabetes mellitus (99%), history of cerebrovascular accident (95%), hypertension (83%), and TIA (79%) [20, 21]. Further, we studied data from the major private hospitals or clinics serving the Caracas population.

        This study has several limitations. As with most studies based on medical record data, this study was limited by the information recorded in the physicians' notes. We did not validate the data about the sensitivity or specificity of the ICD-10 codes used to identify VTEE or AF patients. Additionally, no other standard clinical criteria or definitions beyond ICD-10 codes were used to define the VTEE or AF events. Thus, the completeness of the captured VTEE or AF events is unclear. However, the ICD-10 classification system includes distinct codes for the diseases of interest, reducing the likelihood of misclassification. Previous studies have reported high sensitivity associated with ICD-10 discharge codes for PE (89%) and AF (98%); the sensitivity for DVT diagnoses is lower (58%) [22, 20]. It is unclear whether the patients from the three hospitals and clinics are representative of the overall population in Venezuela. For example, these clinics may represent a higher socioeconomic bracket than the average for Venezuela. This study does not include an internal comparison group to determine whether the characteristics of VTEE or AF patients significantly differ from the general population.

        Little is known about VTEE or AF in regions outside the United States or Europe. This study provides a starting point for additional future analyses of these diseases in South American populations. Accurately assessing the region-specific disease burden, patient characteristics and treatment patterns is essential for understanding the unmet needs and improving public health.

        Conclusions

        In conclusion, the study provides evidence that Venezuelan patients diagnosed with VTEE and AF events are similar with regard to epidemiological and clinical factors as North American and European patients.

        Declarations

        Acknowledgements

        Funding for this study was provided by GlaxoSmithKline.

        Authors’ Affiliations

        (1)
        WWEpidemiology, GlaxoSmithKline
        (2)
        Data Management & Biostatistics, Research & Data Processing, C.A., Torre “Anexo D”, Piso 6, Oficina PH-C, Av. Sorocaima

        References

        1. Lutz W, Sanderson W, Scherbov S: The coming acceleration of global population ageing. Nature 2008, 451:716–719.PubMedView Article
        2. Silverstein MD, Heit JA, Mohr DN, Petterson TM, O'Fallon WM, Melton LJ III: Trends in the incidence of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism: a 25-year population-based study. Arch Intern Med 1998, 158:585–93.PubMedView Article
        3. Heit JA: Venous thromboembolism: disease burden, outcomes and risk factors. J Thromb Haemost 2005, 3:1611–1617.PubMedView Article
        4. Heit JA: The Epidemiology of Venous Thromboembolism in the Community. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2008, 28:370–2.PubMedView Article
        5. Næss IA, Christiansen SC, Romundstad P, Cannegieter SC, Rosendaal FR, Hammerstrøm J: Incidence and mortality of venous thrombosis: a population-based study. J Thromb Haemost 2007, 5:692–9.PubMedView Article
        6. Oger E: Incidence of venous thromboembolism: a community-based study in Western France. EPI-GETBP Study Group. Groupe d'Etude de la Thrombose de Bretagne Occidentale. Thromb Haemost 2000, 83:657–60.PubMed
        7. Hooper WC, Holman RC, Heit JA, Cobb N: Venous thromboembolism hospitalizations among American Indians and Alaska Natives. Thromb Res 2002, 108:273–8.PubMedView Article
        8. White RH, Zhou H, Romano PS: Incidence of idiopathic deep venous thrombosis and secondary thromboembolism among ethnic groups in California. Ann Intern Med 1998, 128:737–40.PubMed
        9. International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision (ICD-10) World Health Organization; 2006.
        10. Dowling NF, Austin H, Dilley A, Whitsett C, Evatt BL, Hooper WC: The epidemiology of venous thromboembolism in Caucasians and African-Americans: the GATE Study. J Thromb Haemost 2002, 1:80–87.View Article
        11. Harley CR, Riedel AA, Hauch O, Nelson M, Wygant G, Reynolds M: Anticoagulation therapy in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation: a retrospective claims data analysis. Curr Med Res Opin 2005, 21:215–222.PubMedView Article
        12. Dagres N, Nieuwlaat R, Vardas PE, Andresen D, Lévy S, Cobbe S, Kremastinos DTh, Breithardt G, Cokkinos DV, Crijns HJGM: Gender-Related Differences in Presentation, Treatment, and Outcome of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation in Europe A Report From the Euro Heart Survey on Atrial Fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007, 49:572–7.PubMedView Article
        13. Walker AM, Bennett D: Epidemiology and outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation in the United States. Heart Rhythm 2008, 5:1365–1372.PubMedView Article
        14. Parkash R, Green MS, Kerr CR, Connolly SJ, Klein GJ, Sheldon R, Talajic M, Dorian P, Humphries KH: The association of left atrial size and occurrence of atrial fibrillation: A prospective cohort study from the Canadian Registry of Atrial Fibrillation. Am Heart J 2004, 148:649–54.PubMedView Article
        15. Spencer FA, Emery C, Joffe SW, Pacifico L, Lessard D, Reed G, Gore JM, Goldberg RJ: Incidence rates, clinical profile, and outcomes of patients with venous thromboembolism. The Worcester VTE study. J Thromb Thrombolysis 2009, 28:401–9.PubMedView Article
        16. Arcelus JI, Caprini JA, Monreal M, Suárez C, González-Fajardo J: The management and outcome of acute venous thromboembolism: A prospective registry including 4011 patients. J Vasc Surg 2003, 38:916–22.PubMedView Article
        17. Bosetti C, Malvezzi M, Chatenoud L, Negri E, Levi F, La Vecchia C: Trends in cancer mortality in the Americas, 1970–2000. Ann Oncol 2005, 16:489–511.PubMedView Article
        18. Kirkman MA, Manhattanakul W, Gregson BA, Mendelow AD: The accuracy of hospital discharge coding for hemorrhagic stroke. Acta Neurol Belg 2009, 109:114–9.PubMed
        19. Birman-Deych E, Waterman AD, Yan Y, Nilasena DS, Radford MJ, Gage BF: Accuracy of ICD-9-CM codes for identifying cardiovascular and stroke risk factors. Med Care 2005, 43:480–5.PubMedView Article
        20. Casez P, Labarere J, Sevestre MA, Haddouche M, Courtois X, Mercier S, Lewandowski E, Fauconnier J, François P, Bosson JL: ICD-10 hospital discharge diagnosis codes were sensitive for identifying pulmonary embolism but not deep vein thrombosis. J Clin Epidemiol 2010, 63:790–7.PubMedView Article
        21. Ghia D, Thomas PR, Cordato D, Worthington JM, Cappelen-Smith C, Griffith N, Hanna I, Hodgkinson SJ, McDougall A, Beran RG: Validation of Emergency and Final Diagnosis Coding in Transient Ischemic Attack: South Western Sydney Transient Ischemic Attack Study. Neuroepidemiology 2010, 35:53–58.PubMedView Article
        22. Kokotailo RA, Hill MD: Coding of stroke and stroke risk factors using international classification of diseases, revisions 9 and 10. Stroke 2005, 36:1776–81.PubMedView Article
        23. Pre-publication history

          1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://​www.​biomedcentral.​com/​1471-2458/​11/​415/​prepub

        Copyright

        © Bennett et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011

        This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​2.​0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.