Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Multi-center feasibility study evaluating recruitment, variability in risk factors and biomarkers for a diet and cancer cohort in India

  • Rashmi Sinha1Email author,
  • Carrie R Daniel1,
  • Niveditha Devasenapathy2,
  • Hemali Shetty3,
  • Susan Yurgalevitch4,
  • Leah M Ferrucci1,
  • Preethi S George5,
  • Kerry Grace Morrissey4,
  • Lakshmy Ramakrishnan6,
  • Barry I Graubard1,
  • Kavita Kapur7,
  • K Srinath Reddy2,
  • Mary J McAdams8,
  • Tanuja Rastogi9,
  • Nilanjan Chatterjee1,
  • Prakash C Gupta3,
  • Sholom Wacholder1,
  • Dorairaj Prabhakaran2 and
  • Aleyamma A Mathew5
BMC Public Health201111:405

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-405

Received: 11 January 2011

Accepted: 27 May 2011

Published: 27 May 2011

Abstract

Background

India's population exhibits diverse dietary habits and chronic disease patterns. Nutritional epidemiologic studies in India are primarily of cross-sectional or case-control design and subject to biases, including differential recall of past diet. The aim of this feasibility study was to evaluate whether a diet-focused cohort study of cancer could be established in India, providing insight into potentially unique diet and lifestyle exposures.

Methods

Field staff contacted 7,064 households within three regions of India (New Delhi, Mumbai, and Trivandrum) and found 4,671 eligible adults aged 35-69 years. Participants completed interviewer-administered questionnaires (demographic, diet history, physical activity, medical/reproductive history, tobacco/alcohol use, and occupational history), and staff collected biological samples (blood, urine, and toenail clippings), anthropometric measurements (weight, standing and sitting height; waist, hip, and thigh circumference; triceps, sub-scapula and supra-patella skin fold), and blood pressure measurements.

Results

Eighty-eight percent of eligible subjects completed all questionnaires and 67% provided biological samples. Unique protein sources by region were fish in Trivandrum, dairy in New Delhi, and pulses (legumes) in Mumbai. Consumption of meat, alcohol, fast food, and soft drinks was scarce in all three regions. A large percentage of the participants were centrally obese and had elevated blood glucose levels. New Delhi participants were also the least physically active and had elevated lipids levels, suggesting a high prevalence of metabolic syndrome.

Conclusions

A high percentage of participants complied with study procedures including biological sample collection. Epidemiologic expertise and sufficient infrastructure exists at these three sites in India to successfully carry out a modest sized population-based study; however, we identified some potential problems in conducting a cohort study, such as limited number of facilities to handle biological samples.

Background

According to the World Health Organization, cancer deaths in India are expected to increase 158% by the year 2020. Although overall actual cancer incidence rates are lower in India than in North America and Europe, the rise in cancer-related deaths is likely to present a significant burden to the already overwhelmed health systems. Unique environmental exposures, as well as the genetic variation among people in India, can provide valuable new information on factors that contribute to cancer risk or protect against it [13]. Population heterogeneity by region, socio-economic status, and religion provide the opportunity to evaluate a wide range and variety of dietary exposures not easily studied elsewhere, including unique oils, grains, vegetables, and legumes [3, 4]. Additionally, spices and chilies in Indian foods contain numerous potential chemopreventive agents yet to be comprehensively examined in epidemiologic studies [510].

Epidemiologic studies of diet and cancer in India are primarily of cross-sectional or case-control design and subject to biases, including differential recall of past diet [1117]. Seminal observations in Japanese migrants and other Asian-Americans have motivated epidemiologic research on unique dietary components related to cancer risk, such as soya products [3, 18]. Similarly a prospective cohort study in India could provide insight into the complex relationships between dietary exposures and cancer, as well as provide clues for possible mechanisms [1921]. Thus, establishing a cohort in India could have a major public health impact for global recommendations by shedding light on cancer risk factors, such as obesity, physical activity, reproductive health, and environmental and occupational exposures [1, 2225]. Early findings would be immediately useful to develop preventive strategies in the at-risk Asian-Indian (AI) and South-Asian populations living throughout the world, where diet and cancer incidence patterns remain unique [3, 2632].

Before establishing a population-based prospective cohort of diet and cancer risk in India, evaluation of specific aspects of the study population, infrastructure, and environment are required. We believe a successful "state-of-the-art" cohort in India would include the following constructs: a wide-range or variability in diet and lifestyle exposures to evaluate associations with cancer risk; the ability to assess exposures using the most current and population-specific methodologies; the capacity to collect biological samples prior to cancer onset and treatment (a particularly important issue in India where many cancer cases present at late stages); and a cost-effective and sustainable, long-term design. Furthermore, although India is a rapidly developing country, the infrastructure necessary for such a study may not be adequate and needs to be evaluated. We also saw a need to assess the potential limitations inhibiting both follow-up and the collection of accurate and unbiased endpoints for a prospective cohort in India [described in [33]].

To evaluate the feasibility of a future diet and cancer cohort, we conducted a multi-center pilot study across three diverse regions of India with population-based cancer registries: New Delhi, Mumbai, and Trivandrum. As opposed to seeking a "random sample", we aimed to capture India's unique heterogeneity in diet and lifestyle exposures to facilitate future epidemiologic investigations of cancer risk. Thus, to further maximize the variability in exposures of interest, namely diet, we recruited diverse religious groups known to follow varied patterns of diet and lifestyle practices; and targeted both urban and rural areas in Trivandrum. In New Delhi and Trivandrum, we also evaluated the feasibility and acceptance of biological sample collection. Similar to established prospective cohorts in developed countries [3437], we targeted India's large "middle class" population, which was believed to be more stable and accessible than other class extremes; thus, insuring the longevity and long-term follow-up potential of the cohort. The rapidly growing and evolving middle class in India encompasses a wide-range of ethnicities, education-levels and occupations, as well as varied access to resources, such as nutrition and healthcare. In this population, we evaluated different recruitment techniques; collected detailed information on diet, physical activity, and medical history; conducted anthropometric measurements and medical examinations; and collected biospecimens. Herein, we outline the study design and recruitment procedures, provide the response rates for study assessments, and present initial findings of the regional variation in diet, physical activity, anthropometry, and metabolic markers from the India Health Study (IHS).

Methods

The IHS was conducted between December 2006 and July 2008 in three regions of India: New Delhi in the north (All India Institute of Medical Sciences and Centre for Chronic Disease Control); Mumbai in the west (Healis-Sekhsaria Institute for Public Health); and Trivandrum in the south (Regional Cancer Center). These centers were selected to capture regional variability in diet and lifestyle and to utilize cancer registries meeting the International Agency for Research on Cancer standards [38].

Sampling in the IHS was stratified by gender, religion, and type of residence (urban/rural) (Figure 1) and designed to estimate the mean and range of various foods and nutrients within each strata with the following precision: mean intake of nutrients would lie within 5% of the true intake value with 95% confidence and mean intake of foods would lie within 10 percent of the true value with 95% confidence [39, 40]. To obtain our desired precision for dietary data and satisfy requirements for estimating the participation rate, approximately 200 households per stratum were required.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2458-11-405/MediaObjects/12889_2011_Article_3217_Fig1_HTML.jpg
Figure 1

India Heath Study Centers with the sampling categories.

Participants were eligible if they were aged 35-69 years old, resided in the study area for a minimum period of one year (to minimize participant migration), had no prior history of cancer or cardiovascular event, could speak English or the primary regional language, had no physical ailments that prevented them from fully participating in the study, and were willing to provide biological samples. Females could not be pregnant. We recruited an approximately equal numbers of subjects for each five-year age category, and one male and one female per household for equal gender distribution and cost efficiency.

Human ethics committees from each study center and the Special Studies Institutional Review Board of the United States National Cancer Institute reviewed and approved the study protocol prior to study commencement. Due to the nature of the international collaboration, the Indian Health Ministry Screening Committee for projects involving foreign assistance and/or collaboration, which is part of the Indian Council of Medical Research reporting to the Government of India, also reviewed and approved the study. We obtained written informed consent from all participants.

New Delhi, India's capital, is a metropolitan city spread over 1,483 km2. The IHS was conducted in the South District, the second largest district with 2.3 million residents (16% of New Delhi's total population), covering 16.7% of the city's total area [41]. Of the three subdivisions in this district, Hauz Khas was randomly selected and of the 19 wards, Wards 13 and 11 were randomly chosen. Within these wards, a total of 23 census enumeration blocks were randomly selected for sampling households (Figure2).
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2458-11-405/MediaObjects/12889_2011_Article_3217_Fig2_HTML.jpg
Figure 2

New Delhi sample selection.

We initially attempted to identify households using the 2001 census information, but the houses listed in the census did not match with the existing properties; therefore, we selected an equal number of houses from each lane of a census enumeration block (contains three to five lanes). Of the 1,298 households identified, we successfully interviewed 626 households.

Mumbai (formerly Bombay), the densely populated capital of the state of Maharashtra is divided into suburban districts and the island city, which comprises 15.9% of the greater metropolitan area (76.8 km2) with 3.3 million people [41].

IHS participants were recruited from an ongoing study of mortality, the Mumbai Cohort Study (39, 40) in three representative areas (Parel, Naigaum, Sewri) from Ward F-South (Figure 3). If the cohort member from a selected household had died, moved outside the study area, or was not eligible for the IHS, then a new eligible person, who may or may not have been a cohort member, was recruited from the same or neighboring household. Of the 851 households identified, 687 households were successfully interviewed.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2458-11-405/MediaObjects/12889_2011_Article_3217_Fig3_HTML.jpg
Figure 3

Mumbai sample selection.

Trivandrum district (or Thiruvananthapuram), the capital of the state of Kerala, is located on the south-west coast of India, and spans 2,192 km2. Trivandrum's 3.4 million people live in four taluks or sub-divisions, which are split into urban areas (34%) and rural panchayats, village councils (76%) [41]. We recruited participants from six urban and 49 rural wards in two taluks (Figure 4).
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2458-11-405/MediaObjects/12889_2011_Article_3217_Fig4_HTML.jpg
Figure 4

Trivandrum sample selection.

The wards were selected to maximize the number of Hindu, Christian, and Muslim participants as a proxy for dietary practices. Wards are divided into three or four polling stations and households were identified with voter lists from 2006 that contained the name of the head of household, address, and the number of adult individuals in the household. Of the 4,915 households identified, 1,720 households were successfully interviewed (925 urban, 795 rural).

Before the study recruitment began, the three centers used multiple approaches to introduce the study aims and objectives to the communities. Trained field staff, along with the principal investigators, talked to community and religious leaders, and/or held public meetings in communal areas. In order to standardize the study protocol and implementation, as well as develop a highly-trained and professional staff, we conducted two intensive, week-long protocol development and training sessions. We also instituted a quality control component where principal investigators of the study sites would pay unannounced visits to the field. The community-based mobile clinics or camps, where participants underwent medical examinations and provided biological samples, were staffed by medical doctors and nurses. This was useful to bring attention and credibility to the study's recruitment efforts, as well as to achieve compliance for the different components.

Study visits

Once households were identified, field interviewers visited the homes to determine eligibility, provide information, and schedule a visit. During the first in-home morning visit, the interviewer administered demographic, residential history, physical activity, tobacco and alcohol use, and occupational history questionnaires, as well as a computerized diet history questionnaire (Table 1). Participants usually completed all questionnaires within one hour. In Mumbai, anthropometric measurements were also completed during the first visit. Interviewers in New Delhi and Trivandrum scheduled a second visit and left biospecimen containers with directions for collecting a first morning urine sample and toenail clipping. Biological samples were not collected in Mumbai as the study center did not have laboratory or storage facilities.
Table 1

Field visits and details on questionnaires

Visit

Forms

Details

Pre-visit

Screening

Household Form

Dwelling type, household members

 

Eligibility Screener

Date of birth, gender, language, religion, eligibility information (pregnant, heart attack < 12 months, cancer, hemophilia, willingness to provide blood sample), contact information

 

Non-response Form

Reasons for refusal

Visit 1

Questionnaires after signing consent form

Demographic

Education, mother tongue, marital status, cooking fuel, household appliances, income

 

Food Preparer

Household information on use of 19 spices, chilies (dried and green), coconut, garlic, onions, 13 cooking oils

 

Residential History

Time at current residence, reason for moving to current residence, contact information in case the participant moves

 

Physical Activity

Vigorous activity, moderate activity, walking, sitting during the past 7 days

 

Tobacco Use

Type of tobacco smoked/chewed, length of time using product, quantity used

 

Alcohol Use

Type of alcohol consumed, the length of time using the product, quantity consumed

 

Occupational History

Current occupation, five most recent occupations lasting 6 months or longer, time at each job.

Visit 2

Medical history Physical examination

Medical History

Information on health care provider, medical conditions, medication, family history

 

Reproductive History

Female - menses, sexual activity, pregnancies, contraceptives, hormone therapy

Male - sexual activity, contraceptives

 

Biospecimen Collection

15 ml fasting blood, first morning urine sample, toe nail clippings

 

Anthropometric Measures

Standing and sitting height, weight, blood pressure, waist, hip and thigh circumference, triceps and scapula skinfold

Diet was assessed using a computer-based, interviewer-administered, meal-based comprehensive diet assessment tool known as the New Interactive Nutrition Assistant-Diet in India Study of Health (NINA-DISH) [42, 43]. This software was developed for the IHS by modifying software developed by Novo Nordisk Pharma India (Bangalore, India). The diet history (DH) component included three sections: a set of defined questions similar to a food-frequency questionnaire [44], an open-ended section for each mealtime to collect additional unique regional foods, and a food preparer questionnaire (amount and type of oils, spices, onion, garlic, chilies, and coconuts purchased per household). A subset of participants completed four 24-hour dietary recalls providing information on all foods consumed during the day.

All participants completed the validated, short-form of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) about total time spent in physical activity for recreation, occupation, household work, and transportation in the last 7 days [4547]. Total weekly physical activity (metabolic equivalents of task (MET-hr/wk) was calculated as the weighted sum of the reported time spent at each intensity using a MET value specific to each category (walking: 3.3 METs; moderate: 4 METs; vigorous: 7 METs).

Biological sample collection and processing

The second visit was conducted either in mobile clinics within the participant's neighborhood or at the individual's home between six and eight in the morning. The participants completed medical history and reproductive questionnaires, and provided 15 ml of blood, 100 ml of first morning urine sample, and toenail clippings from all toes. As an incentive, we offered to provide the participants with the results from the blood analyses. Blood pressure and anthropometric (weight, standing and sitting height; waist, hip, and thigh circumference; and triceps, sub-scapula and supra-patella skin fold) measurements were also taken. Biological samples were transported to the laboratory in coolers within three-hours of collection. Laboratory technicians processed the samples into fractions as soon as they reached the laboratory (i.e., plasma, serum, blood clot, buffy coat, red blood cells) and stored them in equal aliquots at -80° Celsius. Toenail clippings and Guthrie cards with blood spots were stored in a dry environment at ambient temperature.

Fasting glucose levels were determined with the glucose oxidase/peroxidase method [48] (New Delhi: Randox Laboratories Ltd., Antrim, UK; Trivandrum: Span Diagnostics Ltd., Surat, India). In New Delhi only (all reagents from Randox Laboratories Ltd., Antrim, UK), lipid profiles were analyzed using the following methods: total cholesterol by cholesterol oxidase/p-aminophenazone method, triglyceride by glycerolphosphatase oxidase-peroxidase aminophenazone method, and HDL by precipitation method using phosphotungstate/magnesium-precipitation of apolipoprotein B containing lipoproteins followed by estimation of cholesterol in supernatant by enzymatic method. LDL was estimated using the Friedwald formula [49].

Follow up projections

We calculated the expected numbers of cancer cases over five years per 100,000 people for the eight most common cancers at each of the four IHS location (i.e., Mumbai, New Delhi, Trivandrum rural and urban) by gender (i.e., total cohort of 800,000). For incidence, we used truncated crude rates (35-69 years) and age-specific rates (35-39, 40-44, 45-49, 50-54, 55-59, 60-64 and 65-69) from the Trivandrum Cancer Registry (2005-2006) [50] and the National Cancer Registry Program (2001-2004) for Mumbai and New Delhi [51].

Results

Of the 6,355 adults between ages 35-69 identified, 4,671 met the eligibility criteria. Of the eligible participants, 89% (4,177/4,671) agreed to participate in the studies by signing the consent form. We calculated the response rates using two denominators: all eligible participants (n = 4,671) and participants who provided informed consent (n = 4,177; Figure 5). Of the 4,671 eligible participants, 88% (4,099/4,671) completed all questionnaires, 70% (3,272/4,671) provided anthropometric measurements, and 67% (2,586/3,845) provided all biological samples (New Delhi and Trivandrum only). Of the 4,177 individuals that agreed to participate in the study, 98% (4,099/4,177) provided all questionnaire information, 78% (3,272/4,177) provided anthropometric measurements, and 77% (2,586/3,373) provided all biological samples (New Delhi and Trivandrum only).
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2458-11-405/MediaObjects/12889_2011_Article_3217_Fig5_HTML.jpg
Figure 5

Individual center and total response rates.

Of the study participants, 78% (739/942) in New Delhi and 76% (1,847/2,431) in Trivandrum, provided both blood and urine. Both types of biological samples were provided by a higher proportion of females (83%), as compared to males (71%) and adherence also differed somewhat by religious group (71% of Christians; 81% of Hindus; and 76% of Muslims; data presented in text only). The proportion of individuals who complied with anthropometric measurements also differed by region (New Delhi, 86%; Mumbai, 95%; and Trivandrum, 77%), gender (87% of females and 78% of males), and religion (73% of Christians; 87% of Hindus; and 76% of Muslims; data presented in text only).

The mean age of the 3,908 IHS participants who completed the demographic and diet history questionnaires was 47, 50, and 49 years in New Delhi, Mumbai, and Trivandrum, respectively (Table 2). Approximately 48% of the total study population was male. New Delhi had the highest proportion of participants with a college degree. Across all regions, men had higher levels of education than women. The majority of the population (> 80%) was married; thus, household income did not differ greatly by gender. History of tobacco use varied by region and gender; 36%, 15%, and 50% of men in New Delhi, Mumbai, and Trivandrum, respectively, reported ever having smoked. Smokeless tobacco was primarily used in Mumbai (36% of men, 52% of women), as compared to New Delhi (6% of men, 1% of women) and Trivandrum (7% of men, 4% of women). The majority of households owned televisions and telephones, while hot water heaters, computers, cars, and washing machines were primarily reported in New Delhi. In 83% of the women, menarche began between the ages of 12 to 15, while 14% were aged 16 years or older (described in text only). Less than 2% of the women had never been pregnant, while 32% had more than 4 pregnancies. Parity did not differ substantially by religion, but women with less than a primary school education were more likely to have 4 or more pregnancies (42%), as compared to women with at least a primary school education (16%; described in text only).
Table 2

Selected characteristics of study population by center

Characteristic

New Delhi

Mumbai

Trivandrum

Total (n = 3908)*

n = 839*

n = 768*

n = 2,301*

Age distribution (years), %

   

   Under 40

32

16

21

   40-49

31

31

33

   50-59

23

31

29

   Over 60

14

22

17

Male, %

46

48

50

Religion, %

   

   Hindu

77

58

34

   Muslim

3

< 1

34

   Christian

< 1

6

32

   Sikh

18

< 1

0

   Buddist

0

35

0

   Other

2

< 1

0

Urban

100

100

48

Household monthly income (Indian rupees), %

  

   < 5,000

6

36

69

   5,000-10,000

18

45

27

   > 10,000

76

19

4

Highest education attained, %

  

   Illiterate

6

7

3

   Literate, No formal education

6

1

1

   Primary school

7

6

13

   Middle school

15

24

28

   Secondary school

27

56

46

   Graduate/University

31

5

7

   Post-graduate

8

< 1

3

Married, %

94

81

93

Family members in household

   

   (median, 10% and 90%)

5 (3, 6)

5 (3, 8)

4 (2, 6)

Ever smoked, %

   

   Male

36

15

50

   Female

2

< 1

1

Ever other tobacco, %

   

   Male

6

36

7

   Female

1

52

4

Types of cooking fuel used, %

  

   Firewood

1

0

80

   Gas

100

96

78

   Kerosene

< 1

39

23

Household items, %

   

   Bicycle

28

6

27

   Cable

92

89

61

   Car

24

1

8

   Computer

18

11

8

   Hot water geyser

55

3

1

   Phone

95

87

73

   Refrigerator

87

78

54

   Scooter

63

15

36

   Indoor toilet

90

35

55

   Television

99

96

89

   Washing machine

78

34

12

*3,908 participants had complete demographic and diet history questionnaire information

Missing data excluded from estimates

Food group intake varied widely across the three regions (Table 3). Cereals were widely consumed, but the type varied by region. Participants in Trivandrum frequently consumed fermented rice and rarely consumed wheat products. Compared to relatively low intakes in other regions, unique dietary components by region were fish in Trivandrum, dairy in New Delhi, and pulses (legumes) in Mumbai. Consumption of meat, alcohol, fast food, and soft drinks was scarce in all regions. Fruit and sweet snack intake was also sparse relative to high vegetable consumption. There was also substantial variation in food additives, such as, spices, allium vegetables (e.g., onions, garlic), and cooking oils across the three regions [data not shown; described in [42]]
Table 3

Regional distribution of selected food group intake collected in the Diet History Questionnaire

 

New Delhi (n = 839)

Mumbai (n = 768)

Trivandrum (n = 2301)

 

%

Median**

%

Median**

%

Median**

Food

≥ 1/month*

(10%, 90%)

≥ 1/month

(10%, 90%)

≥1/month

(10%, 90%)

Total Cereals

      

   Total rice products

97.8

3.5 (1.0, 9.0)

98.2

14.8 (7.2, 18.0)

100.0

19.0 (13.0, 22.5)

Fermented rice

< 1

0 (0, 0)

41.9

0 (0, 2.0)

96.9

4.0 (2.0, 7.0)

   Total wheat products

100.0

21.0 (14.5, 28.0)

99.5

21.0 (12.0, 30.0)

80.3

2.0 (0, 8.5)

Refined wheat

64.7

1.00 (0, 6.0)

77.3

3.50 (0, 11.0)

16.2

0 (0, 2.0)

Vegetables

99.7

16.3 (6.0, 28.5)

99.9

20.0 (12.0, 44.0)

99.7

15.3 (7.5, 27.0)

Cruciferous

61.1

0.5 (0, 2.2)

84.5

2.0 (0, 4.0)

78.0

1.0 (0, 3.0)

Potato/starchy

98.8

4.5 (1.2, 10.4)

94.9

3.5 (1.0, 8.0)

92.2

1.5 (0.2, 5.0)

Fruits

83.5

1.8 (0, 8.0.0)

77.6

3.2 (0, 9.2)

83.8

2.0 (0, 8.0)

Banana

38.7

0 (0, 2.0)

68.8

1.6 (0, 4.0)

82.5

2.0 (0, 7.0)

Total Pulses

99.4

6.5 (2.0, 12.0)

99.6

16.0 (9.0, 22.5)

97.7

4.0 (1.8, 7.2)

   Pulses with skin

89.0

2.0 (0, 6.2)

97.3

8.0 (3.8, 12.0)

87.0

1.0 (0, 3.0)

Total Meat

48.4

0 (0, 3.0)

85.8

2.0 (0, 4.0)

80.5

1.0 (0, 3.5)

   Red meat

45.6

0 (0, 1.5)

69.1

0.5 (0, 2.0)

69.4

0.5 (0, 2.0)

Fish

20.8

0 (0, 0.5)

84.8

5.0 (0, 9.0)

98.4

14.0 (6.1, 21.0)

   Dried fish

< 1

0 (0, 0)

56.0

0.5 (0, 2.0)

36.6

0 (0, 1.0)

Total Dairy

98.0

8.0 (1.8, 18.5)

57.9

0.8 (0, 7.0)

72.7

1.0 (0, 7.0)

   Curd/Yogurt

96.4

5.0 (1.2, 14.2)

51.2

0.3 (0, 3.0)

70.4

1.0 (0, 4.0)

Sweet snacks

83.8

1.0 (0, 2.5)

61.2

0.5 (0, 2.5)

61.8

0.4 (0, 2.6)

Savory snacks

78.9

1.2 (0, 4.8)

52.9

0.5 (0, 8.8)

86.3

2.5 (0, 7.8)

Pickled food

68.7

1.0 (0, 7.0)

51.6

0.9 (0, 2.0)

72.6

1.3 (0, 7.0)

Chutneys

65.6

1.0 (0, 5.0)

65.9

1.0 (0, 4.0)

93.5

2.0 (0.8, 3.0)

*Percent of foods consumed more than once a month.

** Median frequency of intake/week (10th and 90th percentile).

Women had a higher mean body mass index (BMI) than men across all regions (Table 4), but the overall anthropometric distribution did not differ substantially by region or religion (data not shown). When defined by a lower cut-point specific to Asian populations (BMI≥25 kg/m2) [52] the prevalence of obesity was close to 50%, while 80% were centrally obese based on the waist-to-hip ratio (WHR). New Delhi participants had the highest BMI and waist circumference and the lowest total physical activity. Across all regions, higher educational attainment was associated with lower levels of physical activity and higher BMI (data not shown). Trivandrum had the highest prevalence (61% in urban areas and 46% in rural areas) of impaired fasting glucose (≥100 mg/dl) [53, 54] and over 25% of the participants in the urban areas could be classified as diabetic (≥ 126 mg/dl), while only 18% self-reported a medical history of diabetes. In New Delhi men and women, respectively, 53% and 48% had total cholesterol levels over 200 mg/dL, and 40% and 30% had LDL to HDL ratios above 4.5.
Table 4

Anthropometric measures, physical activity, and blood markers by study center and gender

 

New Delhi

Mumbai

Trivandrum

     

Rural

Urban

 

Female

Male

Female

Male

Female

Male

Female

Male

 

(n = 451)

(n = 388)

(n = 399)

(n = 369)

(n = 595)

(n = 596)

(n = 550)

(n = 560)

Weight (kg)

62.8 (49, 79)

69.9 (54, 88)

58.2 (44, 73)

63.0 (50, 81)

60.5 (46, 73)

66.2 (50, 77)

62.8 (47, 78)

65.9 (50, 80)

Height (cm)

155 (147, 161)

167 (160, 176)

150 (143, 158)

164 (156, 173)

152 (143, 161)

164 (155, 172)

153 (145, 163)

164 (155, 172)

Physical Activity (MET-hr/wk)

30 (12, 100)

26 (8, 102)

175 (15, 342)

139 (12, 400)

127 (51, 263)

135 (34, 331)

154 (36, 263)

118 (17, 330)

BMI (kg/m2)

26.4 (21, 33)

25.0 (20, 30)

25.3 (20, 32)

23.3 (19, 28)

25.0 (20, 31)

23.8 (19, 27)

26.2 (21, 33)

24.5 (19, 29)

Waist (cm)

92.3 (79, 110)

95.1 (82, 108)

86.7 (72, 103)

88.4 (75, 103)

83.9 (73, 98)

85.0 (74, 98)

88 (74, 102)

86.0 (75, 99)

WHR

0.96 (0.83, 1.03)

0.98 (0.92, 1.05)

0.90 (0.81, 0.98)

0.97 (0.89, 1.05)

0.93 (0.83, 1.02)

0.97 (0.89, 1.05)

0.93 (0.84, 1.03)

0.98 (0.92, 1.06)

WHR High*, %

85

95

80

88

87

88

87

92

WTR High**, %

82

79

-

-

55

62

57

68

FPG, mg/dL

103.0 (86, 140)

103.0 (87, 157)

-

-

92.0 (62, 168)

96.0 (62, 171)

100.0 (71,175)

100.0 (70, 171)

   ≥100 mg/dL, %

61

60

-

-

44

46

63

59

   ≥126 mg/dL, %

15

16

  

17

17

28

25

Diabetes, self-report, %

11

13

10

12

21

25

17

18

Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; WHR, waist-to-hip ratio; WTR, waist-to-thigh ratio; FPG, fasting plasma glucose; Median (10%, 90%) unless otherwise specified as percent.

*WHR ≥ 0.9 (m) ≥ 0.85 (f); **WTR ≥ 2

Based on existing cancer registry data in India [50, 51] a cohort of 800,000 with 5-years of follow-up would accrue a total of approximately 5,000 cases of the 8 most common cancers (Table 5).
Table 5

Expected number of cases of the most frequent cancers (based on cancer registry data) in a potential cohort of 800,000 people (100,000 per gender and region)

   

Trivandrum

 

Site

New Delhi

Mumbai

Rural

Urban

Total

Male

     

   Oral cavity/pharynx

155

165

255

165

740

   Esophagus

40

45

50

35

170

   Stomach

25

30

85

65

205

   Colorectal

40

40

50

120

250

   Lung

110

60

225

185

580

   Prostate

35

25

35

80

175

 

405

365

700

650

2,120

No. of cancers in males (shown above) by age categories:

    

   Under 40

27

16

15

20

78

   40-49

86

76

120

140

422

   50-59

140

126

340

195

801

   Above 60

152

147

225

295

819

Female

     

   Oral cavity/pharynx

50

75

120

45

290

   Esophagus

30

35

10

5

80

   Stomach

15

15

15

10

55

   Colorectal

30

35

55

50

170

   Lung

30

30

40

35

135

   Breast

315

295

460

370

1440

   Cervix uteri

190

145

140

85

560

 

660

630

840

600

2,730

No. of cancers in females (shown above) by age categories:

   

   Under 40

72

57

100

40

269

   40-49

210

192

260

185

847

   50-59

209

203

275

205

892

   Above 60

169

178

205

170

722

Discussion

We conducted the IHS to evaluate whether a complex multi-center, population-based diet and cancer cohort with multiple questionnaires and biological samples could be implemented in India. The IHS demonstrated that it is feasible to recruit a large number of adults from different regions of India with an ample response rate. Questionnaires, physical examinations, and biological samples (in New Delhi and Trivandrum) were successfully obtained. However, our study also identified areas that require attention before a cohort study could be established in these populations.

We discovered that a large percentage of participants agreeing to take part in an epidemiologic study would complete all components of the study. These findings are noteworthy, as the conventional wisdom at the time the IHS was initiated held that many of the participants would not agree to provide blood or urine samples or to undergo physical examinations. Our results should encourage future researchers in India to collect biological samples, so that results are comparable to other international studies. However, it is important to note that the recruitment was restricted to individuals who agreed to provide biological samples, which could be an important strategy for future studies. Even though this method could lead to recruitment bias, the internal validity of the study results would not be compromised if there is minimal differential loss to follow-up.

The reputation of the local institutes and the professional attitude of the interviewers were critical to obtaining a high participation rate, as individuals often changed their minds regarding enrollment once staff mentioned the name of the affiliated organization. We also used extensive community outreach (talking to village leaders, open meetings in communities) to provide study information. We observed that having uniformed doctors and nurses on the field team engendered trust from participants, especially for biological sample collection and physical examination; and we found that receiving test results (blood pressure, glucose, cholesterol, and hemoglobin) was a cost-effective incentive for enrollment and participation.

We did, however, encounter challenges with collection, transport, and storage of biological samples. In Mumbai, we could not collect biological samples as adequate laboratory and storage facilities were not available. We found that weather was an important factor in the other regions where we collected biological samples. During the summer, it was difficult to keep samples cold, and in Trivandrum, dry ice necessary for shipping samples was not available. In New Delhi, home visits during the winter months presented logistical difficulties for field staff. During monsoon season, visits often could not be completed. Transferring the biological samples for analysis within three hours was achievable in our study, as most of the collection sites were relatively close to the processing laboratory. A similar strategy may be possible in a full-scale study by establishing temporary processing centers and/or mobile clinics. For the purposes of this study, we also found that we needed to set up reliable short- and long-term biological sample storage. We encountered various problems such as the availability of dry ice for shipment of samples to the central repository, electrical outages, diesel fuel shortages for backup generators, and technical support delays during freezer breakdowns. Some of these problems could be ameliorated with the use of liquid nitrogen freezers. Other large cohorts have had to address many of these issues and may provide creative solutions [55].

The diet history data revealed substantial differences in regional food consumption [43]. For the full study population, the diets encompass a wide variety of foods not consumed regularly in other populations (e.g., fermented rice, pulses or lentils, and vegetables). Variability in dietary components added during cooking also provided novel information that may help evaluate some preventive or adverse aspects of the Indian diet [42]. For example, while coconut oil and ghee contain high levels of saturated fat that could be detrimental, mustard seed oils may have beneficial properties [56]. Future studies that assess these food items could provide valuable information on the chemopreventive properties of spices (e.g., curcumin), allium vegetables, and chilies in relation to chronic disease etiology [5, 7, 57, 58].

We also observed variation in lifestyle factors, such as tobacco use and physical activity. Tobacco use varied greatly between the genders, as in India smoking is not considered a socially acceptable behavior for women. In the limited number of women that reported tobacco use, we found that they were more likely to use smokeless products. The regional differences in tobacco use, such as the preference for smokeless tobacco in Mumbai compared to smoking in Trivandrum (namely in men), may be a reflection of the varied distribution of education and/or socioeconomic status across the regions. Physical activity levels were lowest in New Delhi and throughout the regions physical activity appeared to be inversely related to education and income level, perhaps reflecting occupation-related activity and/or use of labor-saving devices.

The IHS population appears to fit the "AI-phenotype" [59], a model of metabolically obese, normal-weight individuals [60]. To account for differences in body composition across different ethnicities, the World Health Organization provides modified cut points for BMI that may be more applicable to Indian and other Asian populations [52]. When using these criteria, just under half of participants in the IHS participants were obese. Compared with Caucasian populations, AIs typically develop metabolic syndromes at lower BMIs, and for any given waist circumference, have increased visceral fat and insulin resistance, but thinner extremities [6163]. Measures approximating the proportion of visceral versus subcutaneous fat deposition (WHR and WTR) may be particularly useful in this population. Using these measures, we found that compared to Western populations more individuals in the IHS were centrally obese, a predictor of type 2 diabetes [64, 65]. In New Delhi and Trivandrum, fasting blood analysis revealed that many IHS participants were pre-diabetic and dyslipidemic; and thus, at high risk for diabetes and cardiovascular disease [62, 66].

It is important to note that our sampling scheme and recruitment methods may have decreased the external validity of our study population, as we encountered several challenges during recruitment. Study personnel had limited access to individuals of higher socioeconomic status [67, 68], as they tended to live in gated communities. Furthermore, we did not include individuals in temporary housing or of very low socioeconomic status from urban areas, due to potential issues with very limited dietary variability (i.e., only cereal) and major challenges with follow-up, particularly for medical outcomes. Since younger, healthier males were more likely to work outside of their homes during the study visit time-frame we may also have higher proportions of women and older individuals. We recognize that an alternative sampling method for selecting individuals from households [69] may be useful in the future to capture a more representative sample. We also realize that while the generalizability or external validity may be an issue, the internal validity of study results would not be compromised if the loss to follow-up was non-differential.

Conclusions

From this feasibility study, we conclude that there is epidemiologic expertise and sufficient infrastructure at these three sites in India to successfully carry out a population-based study of a modest size. However, our current cancer incidence projections suggest that a prospective cohort study investigating the relationship of diet to cancer outcomes would need to recruit close to one million participants to accrue approximately 5,000 cases over 5-years of follow-up, requiring a greater level of manpower and expertise. Epidemiologists, statisticians, study and field managers, computer programmers, dieticians/nutritionists, medical staff, trained interviewers, and laboratory technicians would be needed in greater numbers to expand this feasibility study in its current form. In addition to fully utilizing local expertise, it may also be necessary to expand public health training programs in these areas. Based on our experiences, it would also be crucial to have personnel who understand the cultural and administrative issues at each study site. Biospecimen storage presents a greater logistic challenge. Field stations for processing samples close to the collection sites or mobile clinics may alleviate some of the immediate issues. However, stable biospecimen storage at the study centers, as well as long-term storage at a central repository would also need to be established. Finally, developing a validated computerized system for all study questionnaires should be considered to ease data collection and management, as we found that dietary information could be collected on laptops even in rural settings.

Abbreviations

AI: 

Asian Indians

BMI: 

body mass index

CEB: 

community enumeration block

DH: 

diet history

HT: 

hypertension, HIS: India Health Study

IPAQ: 

International Physical Activity Questionnaire

PA: 

physical activity

WHR: 

waist-to-hip ratio

WTR: 

waist-to-thigh ratio

Declarations

Acknowledgements and Funding

We are indebted to the participants in the IHS for their patience and outstanding cooperation even during the busy times of their day.

This research was supported by the Intramural Research Program of the NIH, National Cancer Institute. The authors would like to thank all the field, laboratory, data-entry, and office staff at the three centers for their dedicated work to make this study possible. Our special thanks go to Sriram Hariharan of Atribs for developing the NINA-DISH software and Puneet Chadda for taking charge of the New Delhi dietary component, and Mangesh Pednekar and Binukumar for their continued support. The network support provided by the team at the Capital Technology Information Services, Inc., Raj Shah, Anil Srivastava, Chirag Shah, Sachin Parikh, and Keyur Shah, was invaluable for the success of the IHS. We would also like to expresses our gratitude to Eric Berger of the Information Management Systems, Inc., and Judy Walsh, Sujata Dixit-Joshi and Viji Narayana of Westat for data management.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Health and Human Services, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health
(2)
Centre for Chronic Disease Control
(3)
Sekhsaria Institute for Public Health
(4)
Westat
(5)
Regional Cancer Center
(6)
All India Institute of Medical Sciences
(7)
Steno Diabetes Center
(8)
Information Management Services
(9)
United Nations World Food Program

References

  1. Shetty PS: Nutrition transition in India. Public Health Nutr. 2002, 5 (1A): 175-182.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Murray C, Lopez AD, World Health Organization: A comprehensive assessment of mortality and disability from diseases, injuries, and risk factors in 1990 and projected to 2020. The Global Burden of Disease Volume 1, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts. 1996Google Scholar
  3. Rastogi T, Hildesheim A, Sinha R: Opportunities for cancer epidemiology in developing countries. Nat Rev Cancer. 2004, 4 (11): 909-917. 10.1038/nrc1475.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Sinha R, Anderson DE, McDonald SS, Greenwald P: Cancer risk and diet in India. J Postgrad Med. 2003, 49 (3): 222-228.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Aggarwal BB, Kunnumakkara AB, Harikumar KB, Tharakan ST, Sung B, Anand P: Potential of spice-derived phytochemicals for cancer prevention. Planta Med. 2008, 74 (13): 1560-1569. 10.1055/s-2008-1074578.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Aggarwal BB, Sundaram C, Malani N, Ichikawa H: Curcumin: the Indian solid gold. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2007, 595: 1-75. 10.1007/978-0-387-46401-5_1.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Aggarwal BB, Sung B: Pharmacological basis for the role of curcumin in chronic diseases: an age-old spice with modern targets. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2009, 30 (2): 85-94. 10.1016/j.tips.2008.11.002.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Jagetia GC, Aggarwal BB: "Spicing up" of the immune system by curcumin. J Clin Immunol. 2007, 27 (1): 19-35. 10.1007/s10875-006-9066-7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Kaefer CM, Milner JA: The role of herbs and spices in cancer prevention. J Nutr Biochem. 2008, 19 (6): 347-361. 10.1016/j.jnutbio.2007.11.003.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Giron-Calle J, Vioque J, Pedroche J, Alaiz M, Yust MM, Megias C, Millan F: Chickpea protein hydrolysate as a substitute for serum in cell culture. Cytotechnology. 2008, 57 (3): 263-272. 10.1007/s10616-008-9170-z.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Radhika G, Sathya RM, Ganesan A, Saroja R, Vijayalakshmi P, Sudha V, Mohan V: Dietary profile of urban adult population in South India in the context of chronic disease epidemiology (CURES - 68). Public Health Nutrition. 2010, 1-8. First ViewGoogle Scholar
  12. Radhika G, Sudha V, Mohan Sathya R, Ganesan A, Mohan V: Association of fruit and vegetable intake with cardiovascular risk factors in urban south Indians. British Journal of Nutrition. 2008, 99 (02): 398-405.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Rao DN, Ganesh B, Dinshaw KA, Mohandas KM: A case-control study of stomach cancer in Mumbai, India. Int J Cancer. 2002, 99 (5): 727-731. 10.1002/ijc.10339.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Rai A, Mohapatra SC, Shukla HS: Role of fruit consumption in gall bladder cancer. Indian J Gastroenterol. 2005, 24 (1): 32-33.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Phukan RK, Narain K, Zomawia E, Hazarika NC, Mahanta J: Dietary habits and stomach cancer in Mizoram, India. J Gastroenterol. 2006, 41 (5): 418-424. 10.1007/s00535-006-1761-x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Rai A, Mohapatra SC, Shukla HS: Correlates between vegetable consumption and gallbladder cancer. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2006, 15 (2): 134-137. 10.1097/01.cej.0000197454.87356.4c.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Heck JE, Sapkota A, Vendhan G, Roychowdhury S, Dikshit RP, Jetly DH, Brennan P, Boffetta P, Hashibe M: Dietary risk factors for hypopharyngeal cancer in India. Cancer Cause Control. 2008, 19 (10): 1329-1337. 10.1007/s10552-008-9204-z.Google Scholar
  18. Kolonel LN, Altshuler D, Henderson BE: The multiethnic cohort study: exploring genes, lifestyle and cancer risk. Nat Rev Cancer. 2004, 4 (7): 519-527. 10.1038/nrc1389.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Chambers JC, Eda S, Bassett P, Karim Y, Thompson SG, Gallimore JR, Pepys MB, Kooner JS: C-reactive protein, insulin resistance, central obesity, and coronary heart disease risk in Indian Asians from the United Kingdom compared with European whites. Circulation. 2001, 104 (2): 145-150.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Chambers JC, Elliott P, Zabaneh D, Zhang W, Li Y, Froguel P, Balding D, Scott J, Kooner JS: Common genetic variation near MC4R is associated with waist circumference and insulin resistance. Nat Genet. 2008, 40 (6): 716-718. 10.1038/ng.156.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Chambers JC, Kooner JS: Diabetes, insulin resistance and vascular disease among Indian Asians and Europeans. Semin Vasc Med. 2002, 2 (2): 199-214. 10.1055/s-2002-32043.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Murthy NS, Mukherjee S, Ray G, Ray A: Dietary factors and cancer chemoprevention: an overview of obesity-related malignancies. J Postgrad Med. 2009, 55 (1): 45-54. 10.4103/0022-3859.43549.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Kalra A, Nair S, Rai L: Association of obesity and insulin resistance with dyslipidemia in Indian women with polycystic ovarian syndrome. Indian J Med Sci. 2006, 60 (11): 447-453. 10.4103/0019-5359.27971.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Rai A, Mohapatra SC, Shukla HS: A review of association of dietary factors in gallbladder cancer. Indian J Cancer. 2004, 41 (4): 147-151.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Norman RJ, Mahabeer S, Masters S: Ethnic differences in insulin and glucose response to glucose between white and Indian women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertil Steril. 1995, 63 (1): 58-62.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Ramanakumar AV: Need for epidemiological evidence from the developing world to know the cancer-related risk factors. J Cancer Res Ther. 2007, 3 (1): 29-33. 10.4103/0973-1482.31968.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Sung JJ, Lau JY, Goh KL, Leung WK: Increasing incidence of colorectal cancer in Asia: implications for screening. Lancet Oncol. 2005, 6 (11): 871-876. 10.1016/S1470-2045(05)70422-8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Sankaranarayanan R: Commentary: Cancer incidence among Asian Indians in India and abroad. Int J Epidemiol. 2008, 37 (1): 160-161.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Goggins WB, Wong G: Cancer among Asian Indians/Pakistanis living in the United States: low incidence and generally above average survival. Cancer Causes Control. 2009, 20 (5): 635-643. 10.1007/s10552-008-9275-x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Oza-Frank R, Ali MK, Vaccarino V, Narayan KM: Asian Americans: diabetes prevalence across U.S. and World Health Organization weight classifications. Diabetes Care. 2009, 32 (9): 1644-1646. 10.2337/dc09-0573.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Stephenson R, Argeseanu S, Oza-Frank R, Hutcheson M, Narayan KM: Cardiometabolic risk among the foreign-born population in the United States: new pathways for innovative research and health policy. Ethn Dis. 2008, 18 (3): 277-PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Rastogi T, Devesa S, Mangtani P, Mathew A, Cooper N, Kao R, Sinha R: Cancer incidence rates among South Asians in four geographic regions: India, Singapore, UK and US. Int J Epidemiol. 2008, 37 (1): 147-160.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Mathew A, Daniel CR, Ferrucci LM, Seth T, Devesa SS, George PS, Shetty H, Devasenapathy N, Yurgalevitch S, Rastogi T, et al: Assessment of follow-up, and the completeness and accuracy of cancer case ascertainment in three areas of India. Cancer epidemiology. 2011Google Scholar
  34. Schatzkin A, Subar AF, Thompson FE, Harlan LC, Tangrea J, Hollenbeck AR, Hurwitz PE, Coyle L, Schussler N, Michaud DS, et al: Design and serendipity in establishing a large cohort with wide dietary intake distributions : the National Institutes of Health-American Association of Retired Persons Diet and Health Study. Am J Epidemiol. 2001, 154 (12): 1119-1125. 10.1093/aje/154.12.1119.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Calle EE, Rodriguez C, Jacobs EJ, Almon ML, Chao A, McCullough ML, Feigelson HS, Thun MJ: The American Cancer Society Cancer Prevention Study II Nutrition Cohort: rationale, study design, and baseline characteristics. Cancer. 2002, 94 (9): 2490-2501. 10.1002/cncr.101970.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Belanger C, Speizer FE, Hennekens CH, Rosner B, Willett W, Bain C: The Nurses Health Study - Current Findings. American Journal of Nursing. 1980, 80 (7): 1333-1333.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Giovannucci E, Stampfer MJ, Colditz G, Rimm EB, Willett WC: Relationship of diet to risk of colorectal adenoma in men. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1992, 84 (2): 91-98. 10.1093/jnci/84.2.91.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Parkin DM, Whelan SL, Ferlay J, Teppo DB: Cancer Incidence in Five Continents Vol. VIII. 2002, Lyon, France: IARC Scientific Publications, vol. No. 155.Google Scholar
  39. Hebert JR, Gupta PC, Bhonsle RB, Sinor PN, Mehta H, Mehta FS: Development and testing of a quantitative food frequency questionnaire for use in Gujarat, India. Public Health Nutr. 1999, 2 (1): 39-50.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Hebert JR, Gupta PC, Mehta H, Ebbeling CB, Bhonsle RR, Varghese F: Sources of variability in dietary intake in two distinct regions of rural India: implications for nutrition study design and interpretation. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2000, 54 (6): 479-486. 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601042.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. India Co: Registrar General of India, Ministry of Home Affairs. 2001Google Scholar
  42. Ferrucci LM, Daniel CR, Kapur K, Chadha P, Shetty H, Graubard BI, George PS, Osborne W, Yurgalevitch S, Devasenapathy N, et al: Measurement of spices and seasonings in India: opportunities for cancer epidemiology and prevention. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2010, 11 (6): 1621-1629.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  43. Daniel CR, Prabhakaran D, Kapur K, Graubard BI, Devasenapathy N, Ramakrishnan L, George PS, Shetty H, Ferrucci LM, Yurgalevitch S, et al: A cross-sectional investigation of regional patterns of diet and cardio-metabolic risk in India. Nutr J. 2011, 10: 12-10.1186/1475-2891-10-12.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  44. Willett W: Nutritional Epidemiology. 1998, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2Google Scholar
  45. Ekelund U, Sepp H, Brage S, Becker W, Jakes R, Hennings M, Wareham NJ: Criterion-related validity of the last 7-day, short form of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire in Swedish adults. Public Health Nutr. 2006, 9 (2): 258-265.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Macfarlane DJ, Lee CC, Ho EY, Chan KL, Chan DT: Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of IPAQ (short, last 7 days). J Sci Med Sport. 2007, 10 (1): 45-51. 10.1016/j.jsams.2006.05.003.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Kolbe-Alexander TL, Lambert EV, Harkins JB, Ekelund U: Comparison of two methods of measuring physical activity in South African older adults. J Aging Phys Act. 2006, 14 (1): 98-114.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Lott JA, Turner K: Evaluation of Trinder's Glucose Oxidase Method for Measuring Glucose in Serum and Urine. Clin Chem. 1975, 21 (12): 1754-1760.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Friedewald WT, Levy RI, Fredrickson DS: Estimation of the Concentration of Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol in Plasma, Without Use of the Preparative Ultracentrifuge. Clin Chem. 1972, 18 (6): 499-502.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 2007, 2005-2006. TCR:
  51. National Cancer Registry Program, Consolidated Report of Population Based Cancer Registries 2001-2004, ICMR, Bangalore. 2006
  52. [Anon], Who: Appropriate body-mass index in Asian populations and its implications for policy and intervention strategies. (vol 363, pg 157, 2004). Lancet. 2004, 363 (9412): 902-902.Google Scholar
  53. Grundy SM, Cleeman JI, Daniels SR, Donato KA, Eckel RH, Franklin BA, Gordon DJ, Krauss RM, Savage PJ, Smith SC, et al: Diagnosis and management of the metabolic syndrome. An American Heart Association/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Scientific Statement. Executive summary. Cardiol Rev. 2005, 13 (6): 322-327.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Alberti KG, Zimmet P, Shaw J: The metabolic syndrome--a new worldwide definition. Lancet. 2005, 366 (9491): 1059-1062. 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67402-8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Hainaut P, Vozar B, Rinaldi S, Riboli E, Caboux E: The European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition biobank. Methods Mol Biol. 2011, 675: 179-191. 10.1007/978-1-59745-423-0_7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Rastogi T, Reddy KS, Vaz M, Spiegelman D, Prabhakaran D, Willett WC, Stampfer MJ, Ascherio A: Diet and risk of ischemic heart disease in India. Am J Clin Nutr. 2004, 79 (4): 582-592.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Aggarwal BB: Prostate cancer and curcumin: add spice to your life. Cancer Biol Ther. 2008, 7 (9): 1436-1440. 10.4161/cbt.7.9.6659.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Aggarwal BB, Shishodia S: Suppression of the nuclear factor-kappaB activation pathway by spice-derived phytochemicals: reasoning for seasoning. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2004, 1030: 434-441. 10.1196/annals.1329.054.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Mohan V, Deepa R: Adipocytokines and the expanding 'Asian Indian Phenotype'. J Assoc Physicians India. 2006, 54: 685-686.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Ruderman N, Chisholm D, Pi-Sunyer X, Schneider S: The metabolically obese, normal-weight individual revisited. Diabetes. 1998, 47 (5): 699-713. 10.2337/diabetes.47.5.699.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Sharp PS, Mohan V, Levy JC, Mather HM, Kohner EM: Insulin resistance in patients of Asian Indian and European origin with non-insulin dependent diabetes. Horm Metab Res. 1987, 19 (2): 84-85. 10.1055/s-2007-1011745.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Enas EA, Mohan V, Deepa M, Farooq S, Pazhoor S, Chennikkara H: The metabolic syndrome and dyslipidemia among Asian Indians: a population with high rates of diabetes and premature coronary artery disease. J Cardiometab Syndr. 2007, 2 (4): 267-275. 10.1111/j.1559-4564.2007.07392.x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Raji A, Seely EW, Arky RA, Simonson DC: Body fat distribution and insulin resistance in healthy Asian Indians and Caucasians. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001, 86 (11): 5366-5371. 10.1210/jc.86.11.5366.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Kahn HS, Austin H, Williamson DF, Arensberg D: Simple anthropometric indices associated with ischemic heart disease. J Clin Epidemiol. 1996, 49 (9): 1017-1024. 10.1016/0895-4356(96)00113-8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Chuang YC, Hsu KH, Hwang CJ, Hu PM, Lin TM, Chiou WK: Waist-to-thigh ratio with type 2 diabetes can also be a better indicator associated than traditional anthropometrical measurements in Taiwan population. Ann of Epidemiol. 2006, 16 (5): 321-331. 10.1016/j.annepidem.2005.04.014.Google Scholar
  66. Nair M, Prabhakaran D, Narayan KM, Sinha R, Lakshmy R, Devasenapathy N, Daniel CR, Gupta R, George PS, Mathew A, et al: HbA(1c) values for defining diabetes and impaired fasting glucose in Asian Indians. Prim Care Diabetes. 2011Google Scholar
  67. Pednekar MS, Gupta PC, Hebert JR, Hakama M: Joint effects of tobacco use and body mass on all-cause mortality in Mumbai, India: results from a population-based cohort study. Am J Epidemiol. 2008, 167 (3): 330-340.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Gupta PC, Pednekar MS, Parkin DM, Sankaranarayanan R: Tobacco associated mortality in Mumbai (Bombay) India. Results of the Bombay Cohort Study. Int J Epidemiol. 2005, 34 (6): 1395-1402. 10.1093/ije/dyi196.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Kish L: Multipopulation Survey Designs - 5 Types with 7 Shared Aspects. International Statistical Review. 1994, 62 (2): 167-186. 10.2307/1403507.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/11/405/prepub

Copyright

© Sinha et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.