Are workplace health promotion programs effective at improving presenteeism in workers? a systematic review and best evidence synthesis of the literature
© Cancelliere et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
Received: 4 February 2011
Accepted: 26 May 2011
Published: 26 May 2011
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|4 Feb 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|23 Mar 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Nuria Garatachea|
|28 Mar 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Christiane Wilke|
|20 Apr 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Carol Cancelliere|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|20 Apr 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|9 May 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Nuria Garatachea|
|17 May 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Christiane Wilke|
|23 May 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Carol Cancelliere|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|23 May 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|25 May 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Carol Cancelliere|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|25 May 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|26 May 2011||Editorially accepted|
|26 May 2011||Article published||10.1186/1471-2458-11-395|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.