The influence of both individual and area based socioeconomic status on temporal trends in Caesarean sections in Scotland 1980-2000
© Fairley et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
Received: 16 September 2010
Accepted: 18 May 2011
Published: 18 May 2011
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|16 Sep 2010||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|7 Nov 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Alison Macfarlane|
|15 Nov 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Dolores Ruiz|
|17 Nov 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Christopher Aimakhu|
|27 Jan 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Ruth Dundas|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|27 Jan 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|1 Mar 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Dolores Ruiz|
|3 Mar 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Alison Macfarlane|
|4 May 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Ruth Dundas|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|4 May 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|18 May 2011||Editorially accepted|
|18 May 2011||Article published||10.1186/1471-2458-11-330|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.